when it happened at ferrari, it was due to a cockup, the team acted as quickly as possible and the instant the lollipop was raised the driver pulled out (barrichello if i remember) and then the other driver got into the pit.
the difference is that when the stop was complete, lollipop raised and the driver told to leave, he refused to do so.
the team told FA when he was coming into the pit that he would be held for 20 seconds, this is what the team did, but he stayed stationary for another 10, despite verbal and visual orders from the team to move his bottom out of there.
Yes, i know it, but the FIA could punish Ferrari because "deliberately" stopped RB, whi not? They could call him back one lap later, but they didn't. About the team it was the same situation. What i mean is that NEVER FIA took decision in order to estabilish a correct behaviour internal to the team. My worry is that what happened on saturday could be used against other teams, in similar circumstancies, but so far it happened onli to McLaren. On saturday, in front of the judges and the press, RD tried to defend FA, not LH. Whi? And the Massa accident? Whi not punish Ferrari also, because "deliberately" stopped the driver and sent him on the track before without fuel, then with cold tyres without chance to gain one of the first ten places? In other words, the FIA must stay away from what internally happens in qualifyng to the teams. If the team can't more control the situations, punish the team. The team is unable to say to FA that that behaviout is unfair? Well, punish the team! Do you agree?
