FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
#116403
Ferrari looked promising at the beginning of this weekend, but finished poorly in my eyes.

I know Ferrari claimed they were stirring up their management team so as not to continue making tactical errors, but it seems to me they are still headed in the wrong direction. For the second time this year they failed to get a car out of Q1 for lack of effort, and the one car that was doing well in the race was once again hampered by a stupid call during a pit stop. I'm not sure who's calling the race strategy for Ferrari but "short fueling" Massa's car was almost as bad as putting Wet tires on Kimi's car on a dry track.

The Massa situation was made worse by the fact that they couldn't seem to change their strategy fast enough to limit the damage caused by their pit stop error. In the radio transmissions during the closing laps of the race Ferrari were telling Massa to conserve fuel with Vetel charging from behind, Massa in turn was asking if he should let Vettel go, and it seemed to take a few laps before they gave him an answer. If they knew they were short on fuel why did they keep Massa fighting with Vettel for so many laps? Massa should have let Vettel go earlier so he could have kept up a slightly faster pace, to avoid losing another spot to Alonso.

Ferrari to me is looking like the old Ferrari from the pre Braun/Schumacher days, That last big slump lasted 15 years could Ferrari be headed into a 15 year slump again?
#116416
It does seem that no matter how quick Ferrari's car is, the team is simply in chaos. It lost them the drivers' title last year, and it looks like this year it will lose them a lot more.

I'm beginning to think the only reason they managed to do so well in 2007 is because of the McLaren Meltdown.
#116421
It does seem that no matter how quick Ferrari's car is, the team is simply in chaos. It lost them the drivers' title last year, and it looks like this year it will lose them a lot more.

I'm beginning to think the only reason they managed to do so well in 2007 is because of the McLaren Meltdown.


I dunno. With less team mistakes and better reliability, I feel they would have taken 2008 as well.
#116424
It does seem that no matter how quick Ferrari's car is, the team is simply in chaos. It lost them the drivers' title last year, and it looks like this year it will lose them a lot more.

I'm beginning to think the only reason they managed to do so well in 2007 is because of the McLaren Meltdown.


I dunno. With less team mistakes and better reliability, I feel they would have taken 2008 as well.


Agreed, but this year their mistakes and reliability issues are getting worse, and if they keep sliding backwards they'll be the same Ferrari from the late 80's early 90's.
#116428
It does seem that no matter how quick Ferrari's car is, the team is simply in chaos. It lost them the drivers' title last year, and it looks like this year it will lose them a lot more.

I'm beginning to think the only reason they managed to do so well in 2007 is because of the McLaren Meltdown.


I dunno. With less team mistakes and better reliability, I feel they would have taken 2008 as well.

...That's my point.
#116442
No doubt though, the car looks and is much faster. They were clearly the 3rd best team this weekend.

They just keep making mistakes and failing with reliability. I don't know where its going wrong, but it's going wrong everywhere. It's just constant silly mistakes. Not sending a car out for another run, switching to those wet tyres, bad pit strategy calls. We can't tell who's making these calls, but it still needs sorted.

But reliability has to be the worst of it. They have made some great strategy calls this year don't forget. Kimi in Bahrain almost caught Barrichello, whilst Massa in china was close to the podium. But it's just constant reliability problems after another. Two DNF's in australia, another Malaysia. China Massa DNF. Bahrain, Massa had troubles with KERS, and Spain Kimi had KERS troubles along with a Hydraulics failure. That's just in 5 races. McLaren have had less reliability problems than that over the last 3 years combined. It needs sorted.
#116468
No doubt though, the car looks and is much faster. They were clearly the 3rd best team this weekend.



They were CLEARLY NOT! And you yourself list the reasons later in your post. Maybe the car was the third FASTEST, but the team was nowhere near third BEST...
#116488
They have always been useless when it comes to reliability


I think your memory is slightly damaged. :P


Im a slightly damaged person :P


>.<


But, yes. Ferrari's reliability had been pretty good in the early part of this decade.
#116505
No doubt though, the car looks and is much faster. They were clearly the 3rd best team this weekend.



They were CLEARLY NOT! And you yourself list the reasons later in your post. Maybe the car was the third FASTEST, but the team was nowhere near third BEST...


I would have to say Ferrari looked like the worst team. They had the third fastest car, they have 2 of the fastest drivers and yet they only squeaked out 3 points due to reliability and tactical errors.
#116645
They have always been useless when it comes to reliability


I think your memory is slightly damaged. :P


Im a slightly damaged person :P

I would have to agree considering how often your avatar and siggy pic's change :hehe: . The actual term would be 'damaged goods, please return for refund'!
#116646
They have always been useless when it comes to reliability


I think your memory is slightly damaged. :P


Im a slightly damaged person :P

I would have to agree considering how often your avatar and siggy pic's change :hehe: . The actual term would be 'damaged goods, please return for refund'!


Hm, too late to jump on the Virgin Brawn bandwagon?
Hello, new member here

Yeah, not very active here, unfortunately. Is it […]

See our F1 related articles too!