FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
#113522
FIA president Max Mosley has revealed that Formula 1's proposed budget cap will be more than £30m per team, ahead of a further announcement on Thursday.

Mosley, who has led motorsport's governing body since 1993, is positive teams will accept plans to reduce spend in the wake of the global recession.

"People cannot, in the current economic conditions, get enough money to survive without that," he told BBC Sport.

Mosley said he was confident teams wary of the cap could change their views.

Ferrari are believed to be the most stringent opponent of financial limitations, but Mosley believes the budget cap - which is set to be slightly higher than the £30m originally proposed - will be ultimately beneficial.

"We've not had any reaction because they haven't seen the detail," he said, confirming that comprehensive details would be released on Thursday.

"But I think when they do see it they may find it attractive.

"Like everybody else they need to save money, they have to think of their shareholders' money and not just spend like in the old days.

"I suspect when they see the figures everybody will come in under the cost cut, which will come in straightaway from 2010. I certainly hope so.

"It's important we get it in place because if not then we are going to lose a lot of the teams."

Mosley was speaking following Wednesday's extraordinary meeting of the FIA's World Motor Sport Council in Paris - where McLaren were handed a suspended three-race ban for misleading race officials at the season-opening Australian Grand Prix.

A fierce campaigner for cost-cutting across F1, Mosley announced in March that a voluntary cap of £30m would be introduced from next season, but said teams would have a choice.

The option, he said, would be a freedom to spend - but only operate within the existing technical constraints.

The alternative would be to work within the budget, but with the prospect of being technically innovative.

The Formula One Teams Association (FOTA) will discuss the new proposals in London on 6 May having, in January, unanimously agreed to a series of cost-cutting measures - including limits on expensive testing and a cheaper engine for smaller teams starting in 2010.

F1 is one of the biggest-spending sports in the world but the global recession has had a tangible effect, with Honda pulling out of the sport in December and Renault introducing wage reductions.

The budget cap could attract new entrants to the sport, with F1 commercial rights holder Bernie Ecclestone previously stating that he envisaged as many as three new teams next year.



http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/motorsp ... 025566.stm


So what do people think i dont get some of his points tbh, so i hope someone can help meout :confused:
#113531
So what do people think i dont get some of his points tbh, so i hope someone can help meout :confused:


Which ones?
#113533
but said teams would have a choice.

The option, he said, would be a freedom to spend - but only operate within the existing technical constraints.

The alternative would be to work within the budget, but with the prospect of being technically innovative.


that bit so is the budget optional
Last edited by irons_4_ever on 30 Apr 09, 09:28, edited 1 time in total.
#113534
Yeah, there'll basically be two 'classes', e.g. the capped budget teams might be able to run, say a bigger front wing, whereas the uncapped ones would be stuck with a smaller one, but could spend a lot more developing it and optimising it's performance. That's just an example - i don't think anyone knows which parts will be limited yet - but hopefully you get the basic concept now.
#113536
Budget cap is a looney idea 'cos unenforcable for starters.

I can see having 2 championships in 1 though like the WTCC, 1 for manufacturers & 1 for privateers althought that's notwithout some major pitfalls.
#113537
Yeah, there'll basically be two 'classes', e.g. the capped budget teams might be able to run, say a bigger front wing, whereas the uncapped ones would be stuck with a smaller one, but could spend a lot more developing it and optimising it's performance. That's just an example - i don't think anyone knows which parts will be limited yet - but hopefully you get the basic concept now.


not sure i like the idea of that could cause massive issues.

basicly like the DD issues..
#113557
What is the current limit on spend available at the present?, if at all


No cap at the moment. Hence why the big teams can spend spend spend.
Im all for a reduction of cost, but to place a competitive handicap on some teams in doing so, is just plain wrong.
#113564
What is the current limit on spend available at the present?, if at all


No cap at the moment. Hence why the big teams can spend spend spend.
Im all for a reduction of cost, but to place a competitive handicap on some teams in doing so, is just plain wrong.


Thanks for that, I can see why Ferrari are miffed
#113616
Toyota should be the ones who are most upset as they have been p*ssing money away on absolutely no performance for the last several years. Both Toyota and McLaren have spent more than Ferrari over the last 5 seasons but at least Ferrari and McLaren have got some wins out of it!
#113841
what really caught my eye were

1. the cost cap doesn't include the engine costs
2. engine freedom interms of rev limits...

i think we might be seeing some higher revving engines in the coming season...

TOO BAD they dont allow turbo engines....
but i heard BMW is trying with a diesel engine? is turbo diesel engine banned?
Hello, new member here

Yeah, not very active here, unfortunately. Is it […]

See our F1 related articles too!