FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
#102914
Lewis did not get favouritism

Pfft. If you'll believe that, you'll believe anything. Favouritism doesn't have to be an ordered, controlled thing. It can quite easily emerge organically and accidentally.


Just like Making Bacon.
#102923
Lewis did not get favouritism

Pfft. If you'll believe that, you'll believe anything. Favouritism doesn't have to be an ordered, controlled thing. It can quite easily emerge organically and accidentally.

Ok, So Lewis was special to McLaren. But remember McLaren were reluctant to put Lewis in that seat. They EXPECTED Alonso to get the job done and Lewis to learn . Without the experience of Alonso in the other seat, Lewis would never have got that drive that year. Alonso should have handled Lewis. His strategies were fair his ego was just too big.
#102932
Lewis did not get favouritism

Pfft. If you'll believe that, you'll believe anything. Favouritism doesn't have to be an ordered, controlled thing. It can quite easily emerge organically and accidentally.

Ok, So Lewis was special to McLaren. But remember McLaren were reluctant to put Lewis in that seat. They EXPECTED Alonso to get the job done and Lewis to learn . Without the experience of Alonso in the other seat, Lewis would never have got that drive that year. Alonso should have handled Lewis. His strategies were fair his ego was just too big.

Lewis had it easier. It's that simple.
#102934
It's refreshing to see teams that are used to being further down the order fighting for the wins, ok, not really the case in Aus as no one could catch the Brawns but it was great watching Glock in Malaysia.
I'm just glad it's all of the usual front runners that are struggling and there's not just one of them running away with everything.

And can anyone tell me how the hell Heidferld managed that with just 1 stop?
#102936
Lewis did not get favouritism

Pfft. If you'll believe that, you'll believe anything. Favouritism doesn't have to be an ordered, controlled thing. It can quite easily emerge organically and accidentally.

Ok, So Lewis was special to McLaren. But remember McLaren were reluctant to put Lewis in that seat. They EXPECTED Alonso to get the job done and Lewis to learn . Without the experience of Alonso in the other seat, Lewis would never have got that drive that year. Alonso should have handled Lewis. His strategies were fair his ego was just too big.

Lewis had it easier. It's that simple.


Alonso was more experienced he should have handled it. That's pretty simple too.
#102937
Lewis did not get favouritism

Pfft. If you'll believe that, you'll believe anything. Favouritism doesn't have to be an ordered, controlled thing. It can quite easily emerge organically and accidentally.

Ok, So Lewis was special to McLaren. But remember McLaren were reluctant to put Lewis in that seat. They EXPECTED Alonso to get the job done and Lewis to learn . Without the experience of Alonso in the other seat, Lewis would never have got that drive that year. Alonso should have handled Lewis. His strategies were fair his ego was just too big.

Lewis had it easier. It's that simple.


Alonso was more experienced he should have handled it. That's pretty simple too.

Possibly explains why it was a dead heat then. They both failed to do their best equally.
#102938
Lewis did not get favouritism

Pfft. If you'll believe that, you'll believe anything. Favouritism doesn't have to be an ordered, controlled thing. It can quite easily emerge organically and accidentally.

Ok, So Lewis was special to McLaren. But remember McLaren were reluctant to put Lewis in that seat. They EXPECTED Alonso to get the job done and Lewis to learn . Without the experience of Alonso in the other seat, Lewis would never have got that drive that year. Alonso should have handled Lewis. His strategies were fair his ego was just too big.

Lewis had it easier. It's that simple.


Alonso was more experienced he should have handled it. That's pretty simple too.

Possibly explains why it was a dead heat then. They both failed to do their best equally.

Well it wasnt a dead heat on count backs. Also one was a rookie one was a double world champion.
#102940
Lewis did not get favouritism

Pfft. If you'll believe that, you'll believe anything. Favouritism doesn't have to be an ordered, controlled thing. It can quite easily emerge organically and accidentally.

Ok, So Lewis was special to McLaren. But remember McLaren were reluctant to put Lewis in that seat. They EXPECTED Alonso to get the job done and Lewis to learn . Without the experience of Alonso in the other seat, Lewis would never have got that drive that year. Alonso should have handled Lewis. His strategies were fair his ego was just too big.

Lewis had it easier. It's that simple.


Alonso was more experienced he should have handled it. That's pretty simple too.

Possibly explains why it was a dead heat then. They both failed to do their best equally.

Well it wasnt a dead heat on count backs. Also one was a rookie one was a double world champion.

Well the FiA screwed Alonso over after Hamilton effed with him. Also one was the team's golden boy 10 years in the making and countryman of many of the staff, the other was a justifiably self-assured newcomer Spaniard.
#102942
Lewis did not get favouritism

Pfft. If you'll believe that, you'll believe anything. Favouritism doesn't have to be an ordered, controlled thing. It can quite easily emerge organically and accidentally.

Ok, So Lewis was special to McLaren. But remember McLaren were reluctant to put Lewis in that seat. They EXPECTED Alonso to get the job done and Lewis to learn . Without the experience of Alonso in the other seat, Lewis would never have got that drive that year. Alonso should have handled Lewis. His strategies were fair his ego was just too big.

Lewis had it easier. It's that simple.


Alonso was more experienced he should have handled it. That's pretty simple too.

Possibly explains why it was a dead heat then. They both failed to do their best equally.

Well it wasnt a dead heat on count backs. Also one was a rookie one was a double world champion.

Well the FiA screwed Alonso over after Hamilton effed with him. Also one was the team's golden boy 10 years in the making and countryman of many of the staff, the other was a justifiably self-assured newcomer Spaniard.


Who was hired to win the championship for them and teach the golden boy the ropes!
#102949
Who was hired to win the championship for them and teach the golden boy the ropes!

And he probably would have won, had Lewis not screwed him over causing the Spaniard to react and be penalised in a harsh call.
#102950
Who was hired to win the championship for them and teach the golden boy the ropes!

And he probably would have won, had Lewis not screwed him over causing the Spaniard to react and be penalised in a harsh call.


Is "screwed him over" a new euphamsim for drove faster??
#102952
Its Euphamism for "He f***ing raped him"

Well poor little Alonso!!
#102953
It doesn't matter what the topic of the forum is, for some damn reason, it will always end up about LH and McLaren. We can talk about Bernie, Lingeries, push up bras, but it will always turn into a LH debate. People, :wavey: , get over it, he's a great driver that EVERYBODY would love to have on their team, he made some rookie mistakes, had some bad advices, so what :banghead:
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Hello, new member here

Yeah, not very active here, unfortunately. Is it […]

See our F1 related articles too!