FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

[darwin dali]

Surely he would have to condone cheating before you could claim hypocrisy..?

His Driver lost Hill the championship and nearly lost vilenerve the championship yet he goes on about Mclaren loosing trulli points.

Mclaren weren't cheating then they just withheld info also.

He wants to moan about cheating he should go make a post about times schui cheated.

They were lying and thus cheating They are in breach of the sporting code

[bud]

McCheaters strike again! It's bad enough cheating to make your car go faster, but by forcing an opponent into a penalty as well? They are the scum of the earth...

Yeh because your man Schumcher never cheated at all did he?

you stupid hypocrite

deMure is as blind a lamb as they come

Surely he would have to condone cheating before you could claim hypocrisy..?

by attacking McLaren (which is the only reason he even shows up on here) dont you think he does?

Attacking McLaren = condoning cheating..?

Surely he would have to condone cheating before you could claim hypocrisy..?

His Driver lost Hill the championship and nearly lost vilenerve the championship yet he goes on about Mclaren loosing trulli points.

Mclaren weren't cheating then they just withheld info also.

He wants to moan about cheating he should go make a post about times schui cheated.

I still don't think you understand what exactly hypocrisy actually is. Supporting a driver that cheated is not the same as condoning their cheating.

Also, withholding information falls under cheating.

cheat: a deception for profit to yourself

FFS Denthul we all knew what Longbow was implying why are you going on about definitions ffs

[bud]

Surely he would have to condone cheating before you could claim hypocrisy..?

His Driver lost Hill the championship and nearly lost vilenerve the championship yet he goes on about Mclaren loosing trulli points.

Mclaren weren't cheating then they just withheld info also.

He wants to moan about cheating he should go make a post about times schui cheated.

They were lying and thus cheating They are in breach of the sporting code

yet you gave a big thumbs up to Schumacher HYPOCRITES GALORE TONIGHT

[Denthúl]

McCheaters strike again! It's bad enough cheating to make your car go faster, but by forcing an opponent into a penalty as well? They are the scum of the earth...

Yeh because your man Schumcher never cheated at all did he?

you stupid hypocrite

deMure is as blind a lamb as they come

Surely he would have to condone cheating before you could claim hypocrisy..?

by attacking McLaren (which is the only reason he even shows up on here) dont you think he does?

Attacking McLaren = condoning cheating..?

Surely he would have to condone cheating before you could claim hypocrisy..?

His Driver lost Hill the championship and nearly lost vilenerve the championship yet he goes on about Mclaren loosing trulli points.

Mclaren weren't cheating then they just withheld info also.

He wants to moan about cheating he should go make a post about times schui cheated.

I still don't think you understand what exactly hypocrisy actually is. Supporting a driver that cheated is not the same as condoning their cheating.

Also, withholding information falls under cheating.

cheat: a deception for profit to yourself

FFS Denthul we all knew what Longbow was implying why are you going on about definitions ffs

Because he made the implication that they weren't cheating. Why else? Before you make claims and use words, you need to make sure they're appropriate.

[darwin dali]

McCheaters strike again! It's bad enough cheating to make your car go faster, but by forcing an opponent into a penalty as well? They are the scum of the earth...

Yeh because your man Schumcher never cheated at all did he?

you stupid hypocrite

deMure is as blind a lamb as they come

Surely he would have to condone cheating before you could claim hypocrisy..?

by attacking McLaren (which is the only reason he even shows up on here) dont you think he does?

Attacking McLaren = condoning cheating..?

Surely he would have to condone cheating before you could claim hypocrisy..?

His Driver lost Hill the championship and nearly lost vilenerve the championship yet he goes on about Mclaren loosing trulli points.

Mclaren weren't cheating then they just withheld info also.

He wants to moan about cheating he should go make a post about times schui cheated.

I still don't think you understand what exactly hypocrisy actually is. Supporting a driver that cheated is not the same as condoning their cheating.

Also, withholding information falls under cheating.

cheat: a deception for profit to yourself

FFS Denthul we all knew what Longbow was implying why are you going on about definitions ffs

Because he made the implication that they weren't cheating. Why else? Before you make claims and use words, you need to make sure they're appropriate.

[bud]

well wouldnt you say by supporting a driver that has been DQ from a seasons championship among many other black moments in his career that you would condone his actions?

[Denthúl]

well wouldnt you say by supporting a driver that has been DQ from a seasons championship among many other black moments in his career that you would condone his actions?

No.

I followed BAR even after they were banned for the fuel-tank incident. Does that mean that I condoned their actions? Similarly, you're still supporting a team who, by definition, cheated. Do you condone such actions?

[bud]

well wouldnt you say by supporting a driver that has been DQ from a seasons championship among many other black moments in his career that you would condone his actions?

No.

I followed BAR even after they were banned for the fuel-tank incident. Does that mean that I condoned their actions? Similarly, you're still supporting a team who, by definition, cheated. Do you condone such actions?

FFS Denthul you always have to go technical:rolleyes: but ooook lets play this game

NO you arent calling another team that cheated the scum of the earth and acting like a tool! you would have an understanding would you not?

"oh my driver has done some stupid s*** too i know what its like" but no its attack attack! f***ing weak if you ask me!

[Denthúl]

well wouldnt you say by supporting a driver that has been DQ from a seasons championship among many other black moments in his career that you would condone his actions?

No.

I followed BAR even after they were banned for the fuel-tank incident. Does that mean that I condoned their actions? Similarly, you're still supporting a team who, by definition, cheated. Do you condone such actions?

FFS Denthul you always have to go technical:rolleyes: but ooook lets play this game

NO you arent calling another team that cheated the scum of the earth and acting like a tool! you would have an understanding would you not?

"oh my driver has done some stupid s*** too i know what its like" but no its attack attack! f***ing weak if you ask me!

I love being technical. Pretty handy, since I love debating.

And you're right, I'm not calling them scum of the Earth. But then, I'm not really that kind of guy, anyway. I do think it has damaged my respect for them and altered my perception of the team as a whole. But scum? No, not McLaren. I also am the first to hold my hands up when the team/driver I support does something stupid.

[Gaz]

McCheaters strike again! It's bad enough cheating to make your car go faster, but by forcing an opponent into a penalty as well? They are the scum of the earth...

Yeh because your man Schumcher never cheated at all did he?

you stupid hypocrite

deMure is as blind a lamb as they come

Surely he would have to condone cheating before you could claim hypocrisy..?

by attacking McLaren (which is the only reason he even shows up on here) dont you think he does?

Attacking McLaren = condoning cheating..?

Surely he would have to condone cheating before you could claim hypocrisy..?

His Driver lost Hill the championship and nearly lost vilenerve the championship yet he goes on about Mclaren loosing trulli points.

Mclaren weren't cheating then they just withheld info also.

He wants to moan about cheating he should go make a post about times schui cheated.

I still don't think you understand what exactly hypocrisy actually is. Supporting a driver that cheated is not the same as condoning their cheating.

Also, withholding information falls under cheating.

cheat: a deception for profit to yourself

FFS Denthul we all knew what Longbow was implying why are you going on about definitions ffs

Because he made the implication that they weren't cheating. Why else? Before you make claims and use words, you need to make sure they're appropriate.

I dissagree in this case it was to get back was they earned.

Fact: By the rules of F1 if Lewis did not give the place back to trulli and finished 3rd there would of been no need for an invistigation.

They just went the wrong way about it.

[Denthúl]

McCheaters strike again! It's bad enough cheating to make your car go faster, but by forcing an opponent into a penalty as well? They are the scum of the earth...

Yeh because your man Schumcher never cheated at all did he?

you stupid hypocrite

deMure is as blind a lamb as they come

Surely he would have to condone cheating before you could claim hypocrisy..?

by attacking McLaren (which is the only reason he even shows up on here) dont you think he does?

Attacking McLaren = condoning cheating..?

Surely he would have to condone cheating before you could claim hypocrisy..?

His Driver lost Hill the championship and nearly lost vilenerve the championship yet he goes on about Mclaren loosing trulli points.

Mclaren weren't cheating then they just withheld info also.

He wants to moan about cheating he should go make a post about times schui cheated.

I still don't think you understand what exactly hypocrisy actually is. Supporting a driver that cheated is not the same as condoning their cheating.

Also, withholding information falls under cheating.

cheat: a deception for profit to yourself

FFS Denthul we all knew what Longbow was implying why are you going on about definitions ffs

Because he made the implication that they weren't cheating. Why else? Before you make claims and use words, you need to make sure they're appropriate.

I dissagree in this case it was to get back was they earned.

Fact: By the rules of F1 if Lewis did not give the place back to trulli and finished 3rd there would of been no need for an invistigation.

They just went the wrong way about it.

IF

And it was quite clear that Jarno did not take back the position illegally; the penalty was rescinded. McLaren probably knew that the stewards would rule in Trulli's favour, which is the most likely reason that they felt the need for deception.

[darwin dali]

McCheaters strike again! It's bad enough cheating to make your car go faster, but by forcing an opponent into a penalty as well? They are the scum of the earth...

Yeh because your man Schumcher never cheated at all did he?

you stupid hypocrite

deMure is as blind a lamb as they come

Surely he would have to condone cheating before you could claim hypocrisy..?

by attacking McLaren (which is the only reason he even shows up on here) dont you think he does?

Attacking McLaren = condoning cheating..?

Surely he would have to condone cheating before you could claim hypocrisy..?

His Driver lost Hill the championship and nearly lost vilenerve the championship yet he goes on about Mclaren loosing trulli points.

Mclaren weren't cheating then they just withheld info also.

He wants to moan about cheating he should go make a post about times schui cheated.

I still don't think you understand what exactly hypocrisy actually is. Supporting a driver that cheated is not the same as condoning their cheating.

Also, withholding information falls under cheating.

cheat: a deception for profit to yourself

FFS Denthul we all knew what Longbow was implying why are you going on about definitions ffs

Because he made the implication that they weren't cheating. Why else? Before you make claims and use words, you need to make sure they're appropriate.

I dissagree in this case it was to get back was they earned.

Fact: By the rules of F1 if Lewis did not give the place back to trulli and finished 3rd there would of been no need for an invistigation.

They just went the wrong way about it.

And then they LIED about it

[bud]

yeah they lied and got caught! Imagine the teams that havent been caught! but dont go acting all high and mighty about it everyone! thats what pisses me off the most. its not like every other teams s*** dont stink. we have alot of supporters on here of other teams with a checkered history of their own. You should know who you are. if not get back in line! so please just STFU Lewis got penalised theres a race on tomorrow. id rather talk about the sport rather than the politics.

Peace

[Gaz]

They just went the wrong way about it.

And then they LIED about it

[Hanwombat]

They just went the wrong way about it.

And then they LIED about it

Yes theres a race tomorrow, we should be hyped u about this, Im sick of hearing about all this now, whats done is done nothing no one can do to change it but please some people some referring to them as liars and cheats, in all aspects yes they are but come on I wouldn't be behaving like this if it was another team, some people can get a little childish