Alternate system to KERS...

Dedicated to technical discussion...
User avatar
prozac26
Posts: 281
Joined: 14 Oct 08, 00:28
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada

Re: Alternate system to KERS...

Postby prozac26 »

Rivelution wrote:IRL's "overtake assist button" is complete and utter sh!t. I remember Paul Tracy said it only gives like 5 or 6 extra horsepower. This is just another failed attempt by the IRL to copy Champ Car's "push to pass" which used extra boost from the turbo.

Yea, but apparently if only provide 200RPM more. Which in a high-rev NA engine is nothing.
Image

Kubica for 2010 Title.
User avatar
Rivelution
Posts: 3638
Joined: 26 Mar 08, 07:12
Favourite Driver: Kimi Raikkonen, Joe Tanto
Location: 'Murica

Re: Alternate system to KERS...

Postby Rivelution »

prozac26 wrote:
Rivelution wrote:IRL's "overtake assist button" is complete and utter sh!t. I remember Paul Tracy said it only gives like 5 or 6 extra horsepower. This is just another failed attempt by the IRL to copy Champ Car's "push to pass" which used extra boost from the turbo.

Yea, but apparently if only provide 200RPM more. Which in a high-rev NA engine is nothing.



Yep. And its a product of the IRL, so of course its going to be crap.
Image
User avatar
darwin dali
Forum Queen
Posts: 26948
Joined: 18 Mar 06, 02:56

Re: Alternate system to KERS...

Postby darwin dali »

Rivelution wrote:
myownalias wrote:In reality how GREEN can a 800bhp F1 car be?


If F1 wants to be green I think they should come up with a way to use hydrogen as fuel. I dont get why the FIA doesnt push for something like that, instead of giving us a crappy system such as kers.

:yes:
Image Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point. Image
User avatar
prozac26
Posts: 281
Joined: 14 Oct 08, 00:28
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada

Re: Alternate system to KERS...

Postby prozac26 »

Rivelution wrote:
prozac26 wrote:
Rivelution wrote:IRL's "overtake assist button" is complete and utter sh!t. I remember Paul Tracy said it only gives like 5 or 6 extra horsepower. This is just another failed attempt by the IRL to copy Champ Car's "push to pass" which used extra boost from the turbo.

Yea, but apparently if only provide 200RPM more. Which in a high-rev NA engine is nothing.



Yep. And its a product of the IRL, so of course its going to be crap.

I enjoyed watching IRL on road courses. Pretty good racing.
Image

Kubica for 2010 Title.
vaptin
Posts: 6397
Joined: 25 Jul 09, 13:42

Re: Alternate system to KERS...

Postby vaptin »

aye, hydrgoen fueled cars can be really pushed foreward with investment from f1, now that would be awesome. Plus it won't just be "green", it'll actually be better in almost every sense (of course I'm talking what is theoretically possible). It would put f1 cars at the damn forefront, actually I feel strongly enough to go and do something about this.
User avatar
EwanM
Co-Editor
Posts: 11157
Joined: 21 Oct 07, 20:02
Location: Dear Green Place

Re: Alternate system to KERS...

Postby EwanM »

... Gerbils on little wheels.
Forumula One: The World's Greatest Sport
User avatar
headless
Posts: 5914
Joined: 13 Jul 07, 09:42
Location: Cabbage Fields

Re: Alternate system to KERS...

Postby headless »

vaptin wrote:aye, hydrgoen fueled cars can be really pushed foreward with investment from f1, now that would be awesome. Plus it won't just be "green", it'll actually be better in almost every sense (of course I'm talking what is theoretically possible). It would put f1 cars at the damn forefront, actually I feel strongly enough to go and do something about this.

Do it
You're like a dog chasing a car. You'll never catch it and you just wouldn't know what to do with it if you did
:starwars:
User avatar
darwin dali
Forum Queen
Posts: 26948
Joined: 18 Mar 06, 02:56

Re: Alternate system to KERS...

Postby darwin dali »

Image
Image Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point. Image
User avatar
Jabberwocky
Mod
Posts: 16412
Joined: 31 Jul 07, 19:51
Favourite Driver: 5 Iron
Favourite Team: Williams
Location: Oxford

Re: Alternate system to KERS...

Postby Jabberwocky »

I think KERS should be unrestricted. so that a team can use all the power they can get from the system. I am sure that that will make the system more use for the road. It will make the system more efficient. this could then be used by limiting the amount of fuel an F1 car can use in the race. So teams will have to make the Kers a fuel saving device as well
Image
A racing car that does not win, is just art
User avatar
darwin dali
Forum Queen
Posts: 26948
Joined: 18 Mar 06, 02:56

Re: Alternate system to KERS...

Postby darwin dali »

Jabberwocky wrote:I think KERS should be unrestricted. so that a team can use all the power they can get from the system. I am sure that that will make the system more use for the road. It will make the system more efficient. this could then be used by limiting the amount of fuel an F1 car can use in the race. So teams will have to make the Kers a fuel saving device as well

:yes::director: That's what I thought would be the implementation down the road when I heard of KERS for the first time, but noooooo! :rolleyes:
Image Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point. Image
XrayYankee
Posts: 4
Joined: 28 Aug 09, 19:07

Re: Alternate system to KERS...

Postby XrayYankee »

McLaren Fan wrote:
headless wrote:
prozac26 wrote:I thought KERS was more towards increasing overtaking...

Nah, pinnacle of technology.

Both.


No, it's just technology transfer back to industry. It's not "green" in F1 as it doesn't save fuel and nor does it aid overtaking if everyone has it.
User avatar
McLaren Fan
Posts: 8005
Joined: 24 Jul 07, 11:40
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom

Re: Alternate system to KERS...

Postby McLaren Fan »

Jabberwocky wrote:I think KERS should be unrestricted. so that a team can use all the power they can get from the system. I am sure that that will make the system more use for the road. It will make the system more efficient. this could then be used by limiting the amount of fuel an F1 car can use in the race. So teams will have to make the Kers a fuel saving device as well

:yes:
Image
Ayrton Senna: WDC 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991
McLaren: WCC 1974, 1984, 1985, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1998, 1999, 2007
McLaren: WDC 1974, 1976, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1998, 1999, 2008
vaptin
Posts: 6397
Joined: 25 Jul 09, 13:42

Re: Alternate system to KERS...

Postby vaptin »

we really need unrestricted kers, but I don't think the fia know what the damn word means.
User avatar
texasmr2
Posts: 15916
Joined: 15 Sep 07, 12:43
Favourite Team: Ferrari
Location: Texas

Re: Alternate system to KERS...

Postby texasmr2 »

turbocharger.jpg
with a 'boost control' setting knob. The Uni-ECU will have a max boost setting but allow's a driver to 'play' within the perimeter's of that setting.

Just a thought,
tex
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"Sanity and happiness are an impossible combination".
Mark Twain
User avatar
cap-dude
Posts: 2051
Joined: 25 Aug 07, 17:24
Location: Northern Ireland

Re: Alternate system to KERS...

Postby cap-dude »

I've been saying about this idea for ages. Formula 2 have an over-boost button, which allows them to increase their revs for a limited amount of time, 8 times during a race. F1 could easily implement something like this. The engines are already rev limited. Just add a button that allows them to exceed that rev limit, something like 8 or 15 times during a race.

It increases overtaking, without heavily restricting aero regs and thus doesn't remove the whole idea of F1 being the pinnacle of engineering. :thumbup: I'm all for a boost button.

KERS simply doesn't work, because to be fair, all the cars need to be using it. But if all the cars are using it, KERS just negates itself really and becomes pointless. It simply doesn't increase overtaking. Its just another crappy green thing, which lets be frank, isn't saving the world :rolleyes:
Image