
An before anyone goes on to call this off topic, latex is a great insulator against electricity.
Using productive farmland to grow crops for food instead of fuel is more energy efficient, Michigan State University scientists concluded, after analyzing 17 years' worth of data to help settle the food versus fuel debate.
"It's 36 percent more efficient to grow grain for food than for fuel," said Ilya Gelfand, an MSU postdoctoral researcher and lead author of the study. "The ideal is to grow corn for food, then leave half the leftover stalks and leaves on the field for soil conservation and produce cellulosic ethanol with the other half."
Other studies have looked at energy efficiencies for crops over shorter time periods, but this MSU study is the first to consider energy balances of an entire cropping system over many years. The results are published in the April 19 online issue of the journal Environmental Science & Technology.
"It comes down to what's the most efficient use of the land," said Phil Robertson, University Distinguished Professor of crop and soil sciences and one of the paper's authors. "Given finite land resources, will it be more efficient to use productive farmland for food or fuel? One compromise would be to use productive farmland for both -- to use the grain for food and the other parts of the plant for fuel where possible. Another would be to reserve productive farmland for food and to grow biofuel grasses -- cellulosic biomass -- on less productive land."
The U.S. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 calls for biofuels to comprise 22 percent of the nation's transportation fuels by 2022.
Dr Ralebitso-Senior believes that, although anaerobic digestion is an established process already being used by some waste-to-energy companies, its full potential has not yet been realised in solving many of the problems associated with growing biofuel crops.
"We can produce most biofuels using crops -- but the big issue is whether the land could be used for food instead. The loss of agricultural crops is a major concern.
"We call this the food-fuel conflict as the economic returns of growing crops for fuel are often higher and with more farmers choosing this option, foodstuffs inevitably become more expensive."
She says, "Using anaerobic digestion is an alternative method which has considerable potential, but we still do not understand a lot about how it works. That is what we are investigating in the laboratory, seeking ways in which we can optimise and, therefore, exploit the process effectively.
What's Burning? wrote:...I understand, no one likes to be publicly made a fool of, but it would be easier to avoid all that if you don't say foolish things in the first place. While then attacking anyone willing to question the foolishness.
Rinse, lather, repeat.Oh and don't forget to report this post as further proof of harassment of your beliefs. I do apologize for the "wordy words" but in all fairness they're mostly your words.
sagi58 wrote::blush:
I should get back to work, anyway!!
Anyone have a creative idea for a Jack O'Lantern?
Just, please don't tell me they can be used to power vehicles!!
sagi58 wrote::blush:
I should get back to work, anyway!!
Anyone have a creative idea for a Jack O'Lantern?
Just, please don't tell me they can be used to power vehicles!!
CookinFlat6 wrote:...Reminds me of when I was at uni and I invested in carburetor free flow air filters to make my old flatsix faster and had to go hungry for over a week
spankyham wrote:My points are accurate and factual.
I don't see the discussions as contests to be won. Put another way, have you learned anything from our exchange?
spankyham wrote:My points are accurate and factual.
I don't see the discussions as contests to be won. Put another way, have you learned anything from our exchange?
spankyham wrote:Oh look, mini-me has arrived.
Improve your Google and/or reading skills and you'll get a lot out of it.
spankyham wrote:Oh look, mini-me has arrived.
Improve your Google and/or reading skills and you'll get a lot out of it.