- 27 Oct 14, 20:30#422724
Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point. ![Image](https://www.forumula1.com/forum/darling/WebPageAngelWithHornsRight.jpg)
Tesla is fantabulous ![cloud9 :cloud9:](./images/smilies/cloud9.gif)
![cloud9 :cloud9:](./images/smilies/cloud9.gif)
![Image](https://www.forumula1.com/forum/darling/WebPageAngelWithHorns.jpg)
![Image](https://www.forumula1.com/forum/darling/WebPageAngelWithHornsRight.jpg)
Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans
Tesla is fantabulous
Tesla is fantabulous
Yeah yeah, and Elon Musk is schmexy, what else?
Yes, we certainly missed a trick. France is 75 % nuclear and is the biggest exporter of electricity in the world making 3 billion euro a year from this. They undertook their nuclear programme back in the seventies while we copped out.
France is a world leader in nuclear energy and export their technology all over the world.
Anyone wanting to read more might find this interesting, it's very detailed and long.
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Count ... -F/France/
I'm glad the Super Phenix was finally closed - we fought hard for that!
Switzerland and Germany decided to get out of nuclear power due to ^
I wish France would smarten up as well.
..Japan had 2 nukes dropped on it once, they are still around - we have the technology - its a big scare campaign, think about it
I think I must be missing something here. Spanky, are you and the scientists you quote saying we can produce biofuel without creating any emissions and we can then take this fuel to run a car and no emissions come out of the exhaust pipe? Because I don't believe that......
My understanding of Spanky's posts...
For ever two tonns of Co2 the algae absorbes out of the atmosphere, we use 1.15tonnes to produce and burn as a biofuel. Meaning we are still extracting 0.85 tonnes of Co2.
Something like that.
But to be honest Im not sure.
I think I must be missing something here. Spanky, are you and the scientists you quote saying we can produce biofuel without creating any emissions and we can then take this fuel to run a car and no emissions come out of the exhaust pipe? Because I don't believe that......
My understanding of Spanky's posts...
For ever two tonns of Co2 the algae absorbes out of the atmosphere, we use 1.15tonnes to produce and burn as a biofuel. Meaning we are still extracting 0.85 tonnes of Co2.
Something like that.
But to be honest Im not sure.
You got it
As far as damage to the planet, oil, coal and nuclear are all pretty crappy solutions. Which brings up back to this.... Solar is the best course forward, period.
And now back to our regularly scheduled argument.
As far as damage to the planet, oil, coal and nuclear are all pretty crappy solutions. Which brings up back to this.... Solar is the best course forward, period.
And now back to our regularly scheduled argument.
Correct. I already posted a while back that we have gone past a tipping point. Even if we went globally carbon neutral today (in terms of human contributions to GHG is the atmoshpere) GHG will still increase. We have already massively uncovered thousands of years of carbon previously locked under permafrost. Now, as it thaws, it will decompose and return carbon to the atmosphere. Also, the more we farm, the more we will add even more GHG to the atmosphere.
What is need are schemes that have negative effects on atmospheric carbon.
I completely agree that solar is the way to achieve this. I support using organic batteries rather than toxic manufactured ones to not only store, but also to create the energy.
Plants extract and store carbon
If we dont grab them to use the carbon remains extracted from the air
See our F1 related articles too!