Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
What's Burning? wrote:Ferrari should have held on to him.
I agree. I think he would of done much better than their current No,2 driver.
Breaking News:Lewis Hamilton has officially overtaken The Fonz in race wins. With 88 races less. Lol(Without a specially built blown diffuser, illegal front wing, preferential treatment)
Considering the difficulty that Alonso has been experiencing and the lack of success, it's would be a safe bet that Massa would not have been any more successful!
sagi58 wrote:Considering the difficulty that Alonso has been experiencing and the lack of success, it's would be a safe bet that Massa would not have been any more successful!
Personally, I haven't yet shed a tear.
Now now Sagi. How is that '"""supporting"""" Mass in his own """support""" thread, eh?
sagi58 wrote:Considering the difficulty that Alonso has been experiencing and the lack of success, it's would be a safe bet that Massa would not have been any more successful!
Personally, I haven't yet shed a tear.
This is the Massa support thread, pls show some support for the Williams driver who claimed pole position....the only non-Mercedes pole this year.
Breaking News:Lewis Hamilton has officially overtaken The Fonz in race wins. With 88 races less. Lol(Without a specially built blown diffuser, illegal front wing, preferential treatment)
sagi58 wrote: I referred to Ferrari's car THIS year. The car that not even Alonso has achieved success with. If he can't make it work any better, NO one can.
Alonso has finished lower than 6th on only one occasion: bahrain, where he got 9th. He also podiumed in china. I'd call that success, given how dominant the mercedes power units are and how bad raikkonen is doing
I've said it before and I'll say it again, ferrari must have been facepalming when massa got pole in austria!
What's Burning? wrote:Nothing lucky about a team putting a dominant car on the grid. Be their name Ferrari, Red Bull or Mercedes.
I wasn't referring to hard work the team puts into putting a great car together. Nor was I referring to the talent, ambition or stamina of a driver. I believe each of these three components is equally (i.e., 33%) important in the grand scheme.
Rather, I was referring to that one minute factor, that miniscule 1% that the driver, the car nor the team have any control over. That iota that can make or break a race.
sagi58 wrote:Lady Luck is the most potent piece of the winning puzzle!!
sagi58 wrote:I wasn't referring to hard work the team puts into putting a great car together. Nor was I referring to the talent, ambition or stamina of a driver. I believe each of these three components is equally (i.e., 33%) important in the grand scheme.
Rather, I was referring to that one minute factor, that miniscule 1% that the driver, the car nor the team have any control over. That iota that can make or break a race.
So how much is it? Is winning only 1% luck. Or is luck the greatest and biggest component to winning ???
sagi58 wrote:Lady Luck is the most potent piece of the winning puzzle!!
sagi58 wrote:I wasn't referring to hard work the team puts into putting a great car together. Nor was I referring to the talent, ambition or stamina of a driver. I believe each of these three components is equally (i.e., 33%) important in the grand scheme.
Rather, I was referring to that one minute factor, that miniscule 1% that the driver, the car nor the team have any control over. That iota that can make or break a race.
So how much is it? Is winning only 1% luck. Or is luck the greatest and biggest component to winning ???
Yeah....I passed all my math classes during my studies but I'm as confused as you are.
Breaking News:Lewis Hamilton has officially overtaken The Fonz in race wins. With 88 races less. Lol(Without a specially built blown diffuser, illegal front wing, preferential treatment)