Australia - Collided with Maldonado on Lap 2 - Minor Incident
That was really just a racing incident that he didn't cause. Between maldonado's tire and the gravel, he had nowhere to go. He did go wide and give maldonado plenty of space to make the pass because he was clearly beat, so I don't think that one should be held against him.
Unlucky just to be racing against Maldonado in that incident I guess.
Indeed. While Grosjean maybe should've backed off a bit more, the fact is that Maldonado tends to just throw his car to the outside of the corner driving the racing line to the fullest, whether there's a driver there or not. Cars can't just disappear from where they are when you are, by the law, are allowed to drive there and like that.
Again, I think Grosjean was at fault for the crash, but something like a warning and a "you're banned if it happens again in the next 5 races" would've been better and I feel the FIA is killing part of the sport with these kinds of actions.
He has had numerous incidents this year though, especially at the start / first lap or so. Like what Ferrari man 009 says above. Maybe that gave weight to the punishment. Also, the nature of the accident was quite severe, and give or take a few inches, could've been much worse.
If it gave weight to his punishment, he should've gotten more punishments before, showing an increasing severity of penalties as he continued to be in incidents or have gotten a warning and a probation saying he couldn't do it again or that ban would happen. In the incidents listed he generally only took himself out by trying too hard, without hurting anyone else, and we're talking about a young driver who are simply prone to crashes. A few years ago we'd shake our heads and the team would dump him if he kept costing them money in damage. Now everyone is shouting for penalties and bans. In Maldonado's case that might be justified because of the amount of drivers he takes out week in, week out, and the fact he sometimes crashed into people on purpose, but Grosjean just makes errors in judgement. I think this is too harsh a sentence.
Also, the crash itself was just freaky. It wasn't that fast or hard, but cars just started jumping in bad ways. Formula One cars simply have the danger in the fact the cockpit is open. That's why the sides of the cockpits were made higher again after the incident between Coulthard and Wurz a few years back where the Red Bull flew over the Williams after Coulthard made a completely idiotic move. No penalties were issued then, even with the danger and Wurz said it was just a racing incident and they weren't really racing for anything anyway. If something hitting a drivers head is such a worry, close the cockpits, don't ban everyone who causes an incident where it could've hit, especially since it didn't hit.
I'm not a big fan of the who "could've" argument anyway, since generally speaking the nature and physics of the crash meant it was close but could never hit. It's like in football someone says "it missed the goal by inches, it could've just as well gone in" while in reality, if it was on target, the goal keeper actually would've had it, because he was in place.