Filters and digital photography

Discuss equipment & technique - show-off your photography here!
User avatar
myownalias
Mod
Posts: 9445
Joined: 27 May 09, 23:16
Favourite Driver: Jenson Button
Favourite Team: Williams
Location: Wichita, KS

Re: Filters and digital photography

Postby myownalias »

What's Burning? wrote:
Jabberwocky wrote:I agree. But I will deal with it for the price

Or you can use the pretty decent camera on the Samsung Note II you've already got in hand.

Is the canera good on the note II? I have a Galaxy S4 and the camera is not that good in my view, anything over 400 ISO and it's exception grainy and poor definition, forget night photography!
myownaliasThe Englishman in KansasTwitter: @myownalias
User avatar
Jabberwocky
Mod
Posts: 16412
Joined: 31 Jul 07, 19:51
Favourite Driver: 5 Iron
Favourite Team: Williams
Location: Oxford

Re: Filters and digital photography

Postby Jabberwocky »

To be honest. The camera on the note2 is ok for normal day to day stuff.

I actually only used my note2 for when the little one was born so I find it ok for all around point and click stuff.

However I was looking for a camera to replace my rather aged fuji 5600. I have just come into some money and want to have domething to show for it without being too extravigant
Image
A racing car that does not win, is just art
What's Burning?
Banned
Posts: 21486
Joined: 24 Feb 10, 00:09
Favourite Driver: Lewis Hamilton, Nico Hulkenberg
Favourite Team: Porsche North America, Porsche LMP1
Location: PULL IN CASE OF FIRE

Re: Filters and digital photography

Postby What's Burning? »

Jabberwocky wrote:To be honest. The camera on the note2 is ok for normal day to day stuff.

I actually only used my note2 for when the little one was born so I find it ok for all around point and click stuff.

However I was looking for a camera to replace my rather aged fuji 5600. I have just come into some money and want to have domething to show for it without being too extravigant

I don't know if you've fooled around with it but if you hold your finger on the shutter button on the Note II it will take a burst, of 20 or so pics that will get you fantastic action shots captured guaranteed. Since it needs super fast memory for it, it can only store those pics on the device memory not the SD card.
"I don't want to be part of a forum where everyone has differing opinions." Boom...
User avatar
Jabberwocky
Mod
Posts: 16412
Joined: 31 Jul 07, 19:51
Favourite Driver: 5 Iron
Favourite Team: Williams
Location: Oxford

Re: Filters and digital photography

Postby Jabberwocky »

Yes. I particularly like the panoramic shots it does as well.

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 4
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Image
A racing car that does not win, is just art
User avatar
spankyham
I'm DD's eunuch
Posts: 5341
Joined: 18 May 09, 09:07
Favourite Driver: Whoever drives for Ferrari
Favourite Team: Scuderia Ferrari
Location: Starbug

Re: Filters and digital photography

Postby spankyham »

Jabberwocky wrote:...I have just come into some money and .....


Woo Hoo!!! Party at Jabber's place

Jabberwocky wrote:Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 4

And I can see you're already splashing around some of that windfall on Tapatalk upgrades :thumbup: I also lashed out on the 99 cent upgrade. It looks nice but I was hoping it would enable "Polls" but I didn't see them anywhere :(
Image
"He was the fastest driver I ever saw - faster even than Fangio"
________________________- Mike Hawthorn on Alberto Ascari
User avatar
Jabberwocky
Mod
Posts: 16412
Joined: 31 Jul 07, 19:51
Favourite Driver: 5 Iron
Favourite Team: Williams
Location: Oxford

Re: Filters and digital photography

Postby Jabberwocky »

Lol so I was not the only one to be caught by its advertising.

The money is here for setting up the company. The camera is for work purposes as well.

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 4
Image
A racing car that does not win, is just art
User avatar
spankyham
I'm DD's eunuch
Posts: 5341
Joined: 18 May 09, 09:07
Favourite Driver: Whoever drives for Ferrari
Favourite Team: Scuderia Ferrari
Location: Starbug

Re: Filters and digital photography

Postby spankyham »

Jabberwocky wrote:.. The camera is for work purposes as well.


Is that like when I say I buy Playboy for the articles?
Image
"He was the fastest driver I ever saw - faster even than Fangio"
________________________- Mike Hawthorn on Alberto Ascari
User avatar
Jabberwocky
Mod
Posts: 16412
Joined: 31 Jul 07, 19:51
Favourite Driver: 5 Iron
Favourite Team: Williams
Location: Oxford

Re: Filters and digital photography

Postby Jabberwocky »

Really. I thought that was just me

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 4
Image
A racing car that does not win, is just art
What's Burning?
Banned
Posts: 21486
Joined: 24 Feb 10, 00:09
Favourite Driver: Lewis Hamilton, Nico Hulkenberg
Favourite Team: Porsche North America, Porsche LMP1
Location: PULL IN CASE OF FIRE

Re: Filters and digital photography

Postby What's Burning? »

spankyham wrote:
Jabberwocky wrote:.. The camera is for work purposes as well.


Is that like when I say I buy Playboy for the articles?

*censored* is readily available free on the Internet. So buying playboy really is only for the articles.
"I don't want to be part of a forum where everyone has differing opinions." Boom...
User avatar
Jabberwocky
Mod
Posts: 16412
Joined: 31 Jul 07, 19:51
Favourite Driver: 5 Iron
Favourite Team: Williams
Location: Oxford

Re: Filters and digital photography

Postby Jabberwocky »

So are the articles... I am lead to believe

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 4
Image
A racing car that does not win, is just art
User avatar
myownalias
Mod
Posts: 9445
Joined: 27 May 09, 23:16
Favourite Driver: Jenson Button
Favourite Team: Williams
Location: Wichita, KS

Re: Filters and digital photography

Postby myownalias »

What's Burning? wrote:
spankyham wrote:
Jabberwocky wrote:.. The camera is for work purposes as well.

Is that like when I say I buy Playboy for the articles?

*censored* is readily available free on the Internet. So buying playboy really is only for the articles.

Playboy has articles? :yikes:
myownaliasThe Englishman in KansasTwitter: @myownalias
User avatar
sagi58
Posts: 10203
Joined: 23 Jul 13, 22:05
Favourite Driver: He Who Drives for Ferrari!!
Favourite Team: Scuderia Ferrari
Location: 5 miles North of "X"!

Re: Filters and digital photography

Postby sagi58 »

myownalias wrote:
What's Burning? wrote:
spankyham wrote:
Jabberwocky wrote:.. The camera is for work purposes as well.

Is that like when I say I buy Playboy for the articles?

*censored* is readily available free on the Internet. So buying playboy really is only for the articles.

Playboy has articles? :yikes:

Maybe the font is so small it seems like the pictures are underlined?? :twisted:
ImageAfter the agony of defeat, success will be sweet!
User avatar
Jabberwocky
Mod
Posts: 16412
Joined: 31 Jul 07, 19:51
Favourite Driver: 5 Iron
Favourite Team: Williams
Location: Oxford

Re: Filters and digital photography

Postby Jabberwocky »

I always find having to laminate a magazines blurs the writing

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 4
Image
A racing car that does not win, is just art
What's Burning?
Banned
Posts: 21486
Joined: 24 Feb 10, 00:09
Favourite Driver: Lewis Hamilton, Nico Hulkenberg
Favourite Team: Porsche North America, Porsche LMP1
Location: PULL IN CASE OF FIRE

Re: Filters and digital photography

Postby What's Burning? »

eww... you had to go there.
"I don't want to be part of a forum where everyone has differing opinions." Boom...
User avatar
myownalias
Mod
Posts: 9445
Joined: 27 May 09, 23:16
Favourite Driver: Jenson Button
Favourite Team: Williams
Location: Wichita, KS

Re: Filters and digital photography

Postby myownalias »

Jabberwocky wrote:I always find having to laminate a magazines blurs the writing

And Jabberwocky wins the prize for being the first to lower the tone of this thread... :P
myownaliasThe Englishman in KansasTwitter: @myownalias