FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

[bud]

The same old, same old, on and, on and on and I see nothing has changed.

HAHA all your Ferrari propaganda was the same ole same ole bullpoo

[AKR]

DeMuRe wrote : I've stopped posting on this forum lately also, every time I say something pro Ferrari the McLaren Jihad Joe's start attacking with their propoganda and one sided fortune cooke F1 reasoning...

I see exactly where you are coming from. I feel there is no point half the time even discussing things as well anymore as I feel that instead of getting constructive discussion I get nothing more than abuse and name calling. Everyone is entitled to an opionion weather right or wrong. If someone else feels it is wrong then they should say theirs with their facts MINUS the name calling. In a thread not long ago I mentioned that McLaren shafted Williams for the Honda engines. (The Japanese Manufactures topic). It is a theory and it could be wrong or it could be right. I could (and have to tex on a personal post) backed the theory up in a summarised form that is already 3 paragraphs long with possible facts. Of course if I post that here I would get name called rather than a fair constructive view (weather it be for or against) so I choose not to post it for the sake of keeping the peace around here. If you want to know what my theory on this is based on fact then ask me to send it to you in private post. (Anyone else welcomed for that matter, even McLaren supporters). By the way DeMuRe, I like your saying "Jihad Joe's....." yeah feels a bit like that at times, I know exactly where you are coming from.

[mooker]

DeMuRe wrote : I've stopped posting on this forum lately also, every time I say something pro Ferrari the McLaren Jihad Joe's start attacking with their propoganda and one sided fortune cooke F1 reasoning...

I see exactly where you are coming from. I feel there is no point half the time even discussing things as well anymore as I feel that instead of getting constructive discussion I get nothing more than abuse and name calling. Everyone is entitled to an opionion weather right or wrong. If someone else feels it is wrong then they should say theirs with their facts MINUS the name calling. In a thread not long ago I mentioned that McLaren shafted Williams for the Honda engines. (The Japanese Manufactures topic). It is a theory and it could be wrong or it could be right. I could (and have to tex on a personal post) backed the theory up in a summarised form that is already 3 paragraphs long with possible facts. Of course if I post that here I would get name called rather than a fair constructive view (weather it be for or against) so I choose not to post it for the sake of keeping the peace around here. If you want to know what my theory on this is based on fact then ask me to send it to you in private post. (Anyone else welcomed for that matter, even McLaren supporters). By the way DeMuRe, I like your saying "Jihad Joe's....." yeah feels a bit like that at times, I know exactly where you are coming from.

AKR, lets not forget your initial introduction to this forum. You set the tone, and people have resonded. No need to act all innocent.

[bud]

AKR, lets not forget your initial introduction to this forum. You set the tone, and people have resonded. No need to act all innocent.

I hear that!

and demure using the term jihad joe i find really bad as i said before did you not consider if any forum members havent been affected by terrorism?! youre an aussie dont you remember the bali bombings....... i sure do

and if anything to refer to someone as a fanatic as you are with jihad it would be more rightfully at home in calling a Ferrari lamb! a blind follower commonly called tifosi who fits the jihad joe mould more so than any McLaren fan

[Clarkey3262]

DeMuRe wrote : I've stopped posting on this forum lately also, every time I say something pro Ferrari the McLaren Jihad Joe's start attacking with their propoganda and one sided fortune cooke F1 reasoning...

I see exactly where you are coming from. I feel there is no point half the time even discussing things as well anymore as I feel that instead of getting constructive discussion I get nothing more than abuse and name calling. Everyone is entitled to an opionion weather right or wrong. If someone else feels it is wrong then they should say theirs with their facts MINUS the name calling. In a thread not long ago I mentioned that McLaren shafted Williams for the Honda engines. (The Japanese Manufactures topic). It is a theory and it could be wrong or it could be right. I could (and have to tex on a personal post) backed the theory up in a summarised form that is already 3 paragraphs long with possible facts. Of course if I post that here I would get name called rather than a fair constructive view (weather it be for or against) so I choose not to post it for the sake of keeping the peace around here. If you want to know what my theory on this is based on fact then ask me to send it to you in private post. (Anyone else welcomed for that matter, even McLaren supporters). By the way DeMuRe, I like your saying "Jihad Joe's....." yeah feels a bit like that at times, I know exactly where you are coming from.

AKR, lets not forget your initial introduction to this forum. You set the tone, and people have resonded. No need to act all innocent.

+1000

*Edit - way to many 0's*

[texasmr2]

Well that was fun we all released some of our frustration which is a good thing.

Unless the W wing Renault plan's to run is crap I honestly think Alonso will find that
extra second.

[McLaren Fan]

That's true she has but you did not hear that from me because I'm an anti-social tifosi!

I said:

...the Ferrari seems to be having a few reliability gremlins... When will the anti-social Maranello mob test with the rest of the teams?!

So, I was referring to the team, not Ferrari fans.

[f1ea]

Correct. And not only has she set the tone, she continues to keep it at that level.

Give her some some slack... I think she has shown some progress

[texasmr2]

Correct. And not only has she set the tone, she continues to keep it at that level.

Give her some some slack... I think she has shown some progress

That's true she has but you did not hear that from me because I'm an anti-social tifosi!

[AKR]

Bud Wrote : nd demure using the term jihad joe i find really bad as i said before did you not consider if any forum members havent been affected by terrorism?! youre an aussie dont you remember the bali bombings....... i sure do

An Aussie or Australian is someone either born in Australia or an immigrant that has converted his/her citizenship to Australian or has duel citizenship (One of them being Australian). I don't satisfy none of those so therefore I am not an Aussie and you stand corrected Bud. Regarding the Jihad thing, why doesn't DuMuRe get told off for saying it by anyone but I do for mentioned that HE said it. Very inconsistent hey. I feel like I am McLaren and you are the FIA turning against me. Got you hey? *LOL*

[mooker]

Bud Wrote : nd demure using the term jihad joe i find really bad as i said before did you not consider if any forum members havent been affected by terrorism?! youre an aussie dont you remember the bali bombings....... i sure do

An Aussie or Australian is someone either born in Australia or an immigrant that has converted his/her citizenship to Australian or has duel citizenship (One of them being Australian). I don't satisfy none of those so therefore I am not an Aussie and you stand corrected Bud. Regarding the Jihad thing, why doesn't DuMuRe get told off for saying it by anyone but I do for mentioned that HE said it. Very inconsistent hey. I feel like I am McLaren and you are the FIA turning against me. Got you hey? *LOL*

Hehe, try reading the port you quoted and you'll see he wasn't talking to you.

[bud]

Bud Wrote : nd demure using the term jihad joe i find really bad as i said before did you not consider if any forum members havent been affected by terrorism?! youre an aussie dont you remember the bali bombings....... i sure do

An Aussie or Australian is someone either born in Australia or an immigrant that has converted his/her citizenship to Australian or has duel citizenship (One of them being Australian). I don't satisfy none of those so therefore I am not an Aussie and you stand corrected Bud. Regarding the Jihad thing, why doesn't DuMuRe get told off for saying it by anyone but I do for mentioned that HE said it. Very inconsistent hey. I feel like I am McLaren and you are the FIA turning against me. Got you hey? *LOL*

Yeah i was talking to Demure he is from Queensland just moved to London for work. He is Aussie

[AKR]

Ok fair enough. I thought he was English as his location is London. My error I guess. So he moved there from sunny Queensland.