About FORUMula1.com
F1 and Motorsport Forums
F1 and Motorsport Forums
Flyer23 wrote:when i started watching f1 i thought that that meant the engine was about to blow up.texasmr2 wrote:The problem with that is the FIA have outlawed the titanium skid blocks that were used during that era. In fact I used them myself in one race during my formula Atlantic racing. I had the lead and going down the hill at Lime Rock my car bottomed and the second place car backed off because he thought something broke. Gave me enough of a lead to concentrate and pull away for the win.......7UpJordan wrote:Something I forgot to add to the list, one MAJOR thing I would love to see return.... sparks!! Cars running low enough to bottom out on main straights throwing a shower of sparks, especially in the early stages of the race.Oh man I miss that so much also, good call!
TheRoswellite wrote:Under....Get Rid Of: Inverted air foils.......that is down force. Return us to cars, not planes, then many of the problems now facing F1 will be gone. The "cars" will not suffer from a lack of sophistication or technical prowess, as the teams will still spend $-squared to gain that extra tenth. But, what we will have is.....close racing, drivers skill being more to the front, as compared with engineering skill, and passing. And now, with the advent of wind tunnel availability, the FIA could stipulate a car could exert no more than....(say)...5% of its weight in down force. (they could set the number where ever they wanted to begin with) Simple. Let the teams figure it out, and you wouldn't need to have the endless list of wing dimensions, etc.1968 jackie stewart or chris amon...... i thought it was 1967 he won it?
This would also free up such areas as suspensions, or variable (changeable) body shapes (drag inducing shapes for braking?), for development.
It would really be nice to see cars that didn't ALL look the same!
Kimi has done it! The youngest ever F1 champion. A[…]
Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!