FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

[Hammer278]

Jack is the ONLY Joker!

You can't compare them, Jack is a great Joker for the younger aged audience of Batman (5-15) while Heath is for...everyone else.

[andrew]

Jack is the ONLY Joker!

Fits with Burtons almost panto like movie but too happy and lacks psychosis.

I thought it fitted perfectly with the Batman of old. I much prefer him to the Heath Ledger version.

[Hammer278]

^ You see? I stand corrected.

[vlad]

Hahaha, that Emo-Ledger sh*thole doesn't stand a chance comparing to the great old Jack!

[stonemonkey]

[youtube]ipBYB5rCXYg[/youtube]

[scotty]

Hands down the best film trilogy ever.

For the record i much prefer Ledger as the Joker myself. He was just brilliant.

[vlad]

Pure copy.

[andrew]

Pure copy.

Ledgers' version is like a cheap copy. As far as the film version of the Joker goes, Jack Nicholson is the best - but he is one of the finest actors ever so it figures.

[Jabberwocky]

Have you ever danced with the devil in the pale moon light? I say that to all my prey.

[Hammer278]

Hahaha, that Emo-Ledger sh*thole doesn't stand a chance comparing to the great old Jack!

What's your beef with Ledger anyway? Your insults seem a bit too personal for a normal head to head comparison.

[vlad]

Like I said, Emo-joker. Nothing personal, but I don't like all the glory, especially when someone dies.


[youtube]lzzTFJWOOXk[/youtube]

[Hammer278]

Emo-joker? You're mixing up his private life and his performance in the movie which is just dumb.

And Nicholson's comment was pretty crass....probably bummed since his Joker was blown out of the water by Ledger's performance.

[vlad]

Hahaha, so naive of you!

[What's Burning?]

Emo-joker? You're mixing up his private life and his performance in the movie which is just dumb.

And Nicholson's comment was pretty crass....probably bummed since his Joker was blown out of the water by Ledger's performance.

Once in a lifetime performance.

[scotty]

*spoiler alert*

Just realised, wtf happened to Lucius in DKR?!?!