To MADBRAT:
You said: “The perp didn’t know who he was or what value his or his companion’s personal effects were worth. They just looked rich. A couple hundred quids worth would have satisfied him. The real question is what you didn’t just type your ridiculous theory…”
Probably I’ve misunderstood, but I thought that, by saying that, you knew that it was one thief, he didn’t know he was attacking BE, you even knew with how much money would have him felt satisfied and that everything was casual. Sorry if it has been my fault.
Following your “instructions” I will tell you whatever I want. If you say what I say is ridiculous, I’ll say that what you are saying is stupid. And so on. Do you really think this is the best way to behave between two people that are just talking?
I’ve been warned before, but I found it a little bit unfair, because I was called stupid, idiot, ridiculous, troll, etc, so many times that I can’t remember the number, and nobody was warned. When I was warned the only ugly word that I used was s***, just a mistake.
I have to repeat that I’m just talking. I don’t want that to become a fight, but if you want to lead this into a personal confrontation and the mods are satisfied with that, go on, I feel great confronting hostility.
If you can talk to me any way you please, so can I. And don’t ever tell me how I can talk to you.
I never told you how you can or cannot talk to me. Show me where I did.
Your very first post was stupid. It's OK for me to say that. You can call me stupid if I post something stupid, but you can't complain about any negative reaction to your posts. That post was a troll post. Plain and simple. the theory is ridiculous. People can say that. What is there to warn them about?
You call me brat, which is fine, but besides being immature, it contradicts your own professed standard of conversing. In other words, you don't like it happening to you but you can do it to others. In other other words, hyppocritical.
You misquote me. I said that I'd give odds the perp didn't know who he was. Your omission of that little bit, to support your fallacious charge that I claim to know what was going on, seems deliberate.
You are still continually labelling any constructive criticism of your theories as "attacks". Dude, you are not suitable for forums. It has been beaten into your head ad infinitum and it is not sinking in.
I'm not engaging in any hostility. You post your ideas, I put in an appropriate(and yes it is appropriate even if you didn't like it) response, which is the opposite of the gentle coddling and back patting you wanted from everyone, and then you get all pi$$y. You are the hostile one. The hostility you revel in confronting comes from your own damn self. That's why I need to tell you how forums work. I just didn't know I would have to do it more than once. For the umpteenth time, it is fair. If you don't like it then don't post.
If I want to say: “Don’t ever tell me how I can talk to you”, “Please, don’t attack me”, “Don’t try to give me lessons about how I must behave in a forum or anywhere else”, “I’ve never misquoted you”, “You’re a troll, because you don’t try to debate, but to engage into a personal confrontation”, “Don’t tell me if I am or not suitable for forums”, “You has never known what constructive criticism is”, “Don’t beat anything into my head at infinitum, because nobody like it” “ Don’t insult me” and “You’re plenty of rage and hostility”. I will do it. In fact that’s what I’m saying to you because I think is the truth and if you don’t like it, then don’t post. Don’t forget that people can talk to you any way they please.
:
.
.
ask for new jewelry because she was so traumatized ie not in his will 
!!
.
