FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

[racechick]

Racechick , hamilton is gonna let you eat your words one of these days. He not only proved he is disloyal to mclaren ( who made him btw ) he also made clear what he's prepared to do for a point or two. I dont blame Chris for being so critical about the guy - he seeing the light now that hammies true colours is showing, maybe about time you take off your blinkers ?? or you going to blindly hangon until you the last one vying for him..??

You miss my point. read the post again. Im saying whether or not he is loyal is irrelevant to why I support him.I brought up that list as an example of things that can be directed at many drivers, as an indication of peoples hypocrasy

[Tony_sa]

Racechick , hamilton is gonna let you eat your words one of these days. He not only proved he is disloyal to mclaren ( who made him btw ) he also made clear what he's prepared to do for a point or two. I dont blame Chris for being so critical about the guy - he seeing the light now that hammies true colours is showing, maybe about time you take off your blinkers ?? or you going to blindly hangon until you the last one vying for him..??

1.How has he been disloyal to Mclaren?
2. Oz was a Mclaren or Join LH and Mclaren decision.

we wont be going there again Longbow - its been discussed , buried , exumed and discussed again. lets leave it at that.

[Tony_sa]

Racechick , hamilton is gonna let you eat your words one of these days. He not only proved he is disloyal to mclaren ( who made him btw ) he also made clear what he's prepared to do for a point or two. I dont blame Chris for being so critical about the guy - he seeing the light now that hammies true colours is showing, maybe about time you take off your blinkers ?? or you going to blindly hangon until you the last one vying for him..??

You miss my point. read the post again. Im saying whether or not he is loyal is irrelevant to why I support him.I brought up that list as an example of things that can be directed at many drivers, as an indication of peoples hypocrasy

[racechick]

Racechick , hamilton is gonna let you eat your words one of these days. He not only proved he is disloyal to mclaren ( who made him btw ) he also made clear what he's prepared to do for a point or two. I dont blame Chris for being so critical about the guy - he seeing the light now that hammies true colours is showing, maybe about time you take off your blinkers ?? or you going to blindly hangon until you the last one vying for him..??

You miss my point. read the post again. Im saying whether or not he is loyal is irrelevant to why I support him.I brought up that list as an example of things that can be directed at many drivers, as an indication of peoples hypocrasy

Whats that supposed to mean? You still dont understand my post? It was an answer to Bills post. I really think you've missed the point. Try agen.

[Tony_sa]

Racechick , hamilton is gonna let you eat your words one of these days. He not only proved he is disloyal to mclaren ( who made him btw ) he also made clear what he's prepared to do for a point or two. I dont blame Chris for being so critical about the guy - he seeing the light now that hammies true colours is showing, maybe about time you take off your blinkers ?? or you going to blindly hangon until you the last one vying for him..??

You miss my point. read the post again. Im saying whether or not he is loyal is irrelevant to why I support him.I brought up that list as an example of things that can be directed at many drivers, as an indication of peoples hypocrasy

Whats that supposed to mean? You still dont understand my post? It was an answer to Bills post. I really think you've missed the point. Try agen.

No angel .. I got you the first time....I need some caffienne - lots of it.

[darwin dali]

What I do think is that Lewis has the talent and skill that Senna had,the raw talent and car control.

2 spins and another off today - don't think so.

[bud]

What I do think is that Lewis has the talent and skill that Senna had,the raw talent and car control.

2 spins and another off today - don't think so.

While i dont think he has the skill of Senna even Senna had spins and offs. i dont know why people bag drivers based on their bad races and disregard their good ones.

[darwin dali]

What I do think is that Lewis has the talent and skill that Senna had,the raw talent and car control.

2 spins and another off today - don't think so.

While i dont think he has the skill of Senna even Senna had spins and offs. i dont know why people bag drivers based on their bad races and disregard their good ones.

Tell that to the people who ridiculed FM after Silverstone. Today he was driving a fine race in the wet until his car gave out.

[racechick]

What I do think is that Lewis has the talent and skill that Senna had,the raw talent and car control.

2 spins and another off today - don't think so.

You dont have to agree I was explaining my viewpoint.

[darwin dali]

What I do think is that Lewis has the talent and skill that Senna had,the raw talent and car control.

2 spins and another off today - don't think so.

You dont have to agree I was explaining my viewpoint.

And I just explained why I don't agree with your viewpoint

[MAD MAX]

And I just explained why I don't agree with your viewpoint

Your both right, well sort of . Anyhow wtf is a Forum Queen?, is that the head Mod, owner of the site or what, I thank you

[darwin dali]

And I just explained why I don't agree with your viewpoint

Your both right, well sort of . Anyhow wtf is a Forum Queen?, is that the head Mod, owner of the site or what, I thank you

It's a long story and you'd have to dig deep in the archives to the beginnings of this forum. I'm the all powerful site admin who helps the founder of the site King Stephen with my

[MAD MAX]

It's a long story and you'd have to dig deep in the archives to the beginnings of this forum. I'm the all powerful site admin who helps the founder of the site King Stephen with my

Thanks for the explanation

[cap-dude]

And I just explained why I don't agree with your viewpoint

Your both right, well sort of . Anyhow wtf is a Forum Queen?, is that the head Mod, owner of the site or what, I thank you

It's a long story and you'd have to dig deep in the archives to the beginnings of this forum. I'm the all powerful site admin who helps the founder of the site King Stephen with my

I was actually reading the PM I got from Stephen today regarding your title from way back when you got promoted.

[billindenver]

What I do think is that Lewis has the talent and skill that Senna had,the raw talent and car control.

2 spins and another off today - don't think so.

Agreed. He may one day develop into the talent he currently believes he is...but from what we have seen thusfar...he is not even close to being Senna or Michael. With that said, he is certainly not the worst driver in F1..I would put him mid pack personally. But, when you factor in the other craziness...I would hire many other drivers over him if it were my money to spend.

As far as this weekend's drive goes, any driver out there can go five blistering laps, destroy his tires and blame them for the spins...but the great drivers alter their driving style to take the limits of the car/tires into account. Saying after the race that you were really fast...but your driving style destroyed the tires (while your team mate had no such difficulty)....is the same thing as saying the car was good but you didn't drive it properly. That is as plain as day to anyone who has ever been on that side of the fence. When Massa completely hosed it in Silverstone...it was all because he sucks as a driver and he made no excuses what so ever for it....but when Hamilton has the exact same drive it was his skill level that brought the car home? Pfft. Had any one of his multiple offs gone just a little bit wrong he would have been done just like Massa at Silverstone.

The only reason this is a story at all is because Hamilton is the self appointed god of rain....which it is quite apparent now is not true. Silverstone, as I recall and feel free to correct me if I have it wrong, caught Ferrari on a dry setup gamble while McLaren was setup to handle rain. Again, from aging memory, didn't the track dry towards the end and Ferrari take the fastest lap of the day? So, I think the difference on that day was a bad decision by Ferrari and a good one by McLaren. This weeks race, all the teams were setup for dry...and I think this is a far better showing of who actually handles rain better in comparable setups.