FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
#227657
The problem is, your considerations aren't the simplest.

Gallio had a method to his madness if you like, he could explain logically why the world worked x way, or at least measure it to show that it did.


The problem is that you apparently don’t understand anything about what I’m saying. The simplest is NOT ALWAYS the truth. There are other options. I’m only trying to take a look at them. That’s all. I don’t deserve to be attacked for doing so.


I'm not attacking you,

I'm not saying it is the truth, its just you seem to be pointing out alternatives for the sake of it. And I disagree in this instance that it counts as an exercise of logic. If you want to say something different, I feel you should also tell us why your saying it.
#227672
To MADBRAT:
You said: “The perp didn’t know who he was or what value his or his companion’s personal effects were worth. They just looked rich. A couple hundred quids worth would have satisfied him. The real question is what you didn’t just type your ridiculous theory…”
Probably I’ve misunderstood, but I thought that, by saying that, you knew that it was one thief, he didn’t know he was attacking BE, you even knew with how much money would have him felt satisfied and that everything was casual. Sorry if it has been my fault.
Following your “instructions” I will tell you whatever I want. If you say what I say is ridiculous, I’ll say that what you are saying is stupid. And so on. Do you really think this is the best way to behave between two people that are just talking?
I’ve been warned before, but I found it a little bit unfair, because I was called stupid, idiot, ridiculous, troll, etc, so many times that I can’t remember the number, and nobody was warned. When I was warned the only ugly word that I used was s***, just a mistake.
I have to repeat that I’m just talking. I don’t want that to become a fight, but if you want to lead this into a personal confrontation and the mods are satisfied with that, go on, I feel great confronting hostility.
If you can talk to me any way you please, so can I. And don’t ever tell me how I can talk to you.


I never told you how you can or cannot talk to me. Show me where I did.
Your very first post was stupid. It's OK for me to say that. You can call me stupid if I post something stupid, but you can't complain about any negative reaction to your posts. That post was a troll post. Plain and simple. the theory is ridiculous. People can say that. What is there to warn them about?
You call me brat, which is fine, but besides being immature, it contradicts your own professed standard of conversing. In other words, you don't like it happening to you but you can do it to others. In other other words, hyppocritical.
You misquote me. I said that I'd give odds the perp didn't know who he was. Your omission of that little bit, to support your fallacious charge that I claim to know what was going on, seems deliberate.
You are still continually labelling any constructive criticism of your theories as "attacks". Dude, you are not suitable for forums. It has been beaten into your head ad infinitum and it is not sinking in.
I'm not engaging in any hostility. You post your ideas, I put in an appropriate(and yes it is appropriate even if you didn't like it) response, which is the opposite of the gentle coddling and back patting you wanted from everyone, and then you get all pi$$y. You are the hostile one. The hostility you revel in confronting comes from your own damn self. That's why I need to tell you how forums work. I just didn't know I would have to do it more than once. For the umpteenth time, it is fair. If you don't like it then don't post.
#227747
The problem is, your considerations aren't the simplest.

Gallio had a method to his madness if you like, he could explain logically why the world worked x way, or at least measure it to show that it did.


The problem is that you apparently don’t understand anything about what I’m saying. The simplest is NOT ALWAYS the truth. There are other options. I’m only trying to take a look at them. That’s all. I don’t deserve to be attacked for doing so.


I'm not attacking you,

I'm not saying it is the truth, its just you seem to be pointing out alternatives for the sake of it. And I disagree in this instance that it counts as an exercise of logic. If you want to say something different, I feel you should also tell us why your saying it.


Yes. I’m pointing out alternatives for the sake of it. Our brains work as computers; they receive information and process it. Then we arrive to conclusions that affect our decisions, behavior, emotions, sentiments and our whole life. If that information has been manipulated all of us have been manipulated. In the era of communications massive manipulation has become usual. We have become a mass of consumers. One of the things we consume is Formula 1 and they have their department of marketing to decide what is better for raising the number of consumers and his satisfaction in order to improve the sales, the audiences and the benefits. We can accept the information as it comes or for instance we can go into it and try to evaluate its credibility. Most of times we won’t arrive to any decisive conclusion but I believe that in any case is a healthy exercise.
In the BE’s case. Have you seen a photography showing his face? He was brutally beaten. Four men were waiting for him when he was arriving at his office building. Four men targeting him and stealing 200.000 pounds in jewelry. “There can be little doubt this was a targeted robbery because of who Mr Ecclestone is”, a police representative told the Sun.
Then they changed the whole story and it had been something casual that took place when they were arriving at home just because they were apparently rich, the thieves only stole their watches. Why did they change the story?
BE is a powerful billionaire who has a lot of enemies, that’s for sure. Any of them wanted to give him a lesson? I don’t know, but is perfectly possible.
All that, and some other things I’ve said previously, takes me to put into question the credibility of the whole story. That’s all. Is it enough? Off course not, but it is enough for me, because we’re just talking.
#227839
This probably wouldn't have happened if Bernie lived in safer cities, like Metropolis or Gotham City.

Gotham City, yeah! Come to mamma! :whip::twisted:

:rofl: Your such a slut no wonder I find you so appealing :wink::whip: !
#227840
This probably wouldn't have happened if Bernie lived in safer cities, like Metropolis or Gotham City.

Gotham City, yeah! Come to mamma! :whip::twisted:

:rofl: Your such a slut no wonder I find you so appealing :wink::whip: !


Fo shure honey, I find you appealing as well even though you're such a

Image
#227843
This probably wouldn't have happened if Bernie lived in safer cities, like Metropolis or Gotham City.

Gotham City, yeah! Come to mamma! :whip::twisted:

:rofl: Your such a slut no wonder I find you so appealing :wink::whip: !


Fo shure honey, I find you appealing as well even though you're such a

Image


Alittle harsh don't ya think since I'm such a delicate flower :blush: , no 'tea-bag' for you tonight then :director: .
#227846
This probably wouldn't have happened if Bernie lived in safer cities, like Metropolis or Gotham City.

Gotham City, yeah! Come to mamma! :whip::twisted:

:rofl: Your such a slut no wonder I find you so appealing :wink::whip: !


Fo shure honey, I find you appealing as well even though you're such a

Image


Alittle harsh don't ya think since I'm such a delicate flower :blush: , no 'tea-bag' for you tonight then :director: .

Fine, be that way - I'll just pinata your nut sack then, baddabing, baddaboom :hehe:

See our F1 related articles too!