FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
User avatar
By EwanM
#61694
AKR, don't push your luck. heheh
Even though It would have been wrong for Massa to lose this race, Ferrari have really been cocking up recently.
They need to sort out their reliability...
Also why can't they just use the normal system like everyone else in the pits, instead of traffic lights... it's pointless!
User avatar
By przemo
#61702
Also why can't they just use the normal system like everyone else in the pits, instead of traffic lights... it's pointless!

Why pointless? It was Raikkonen's fault, he left while the red light was lit.
User avatar
By EwanM
#61705
Also why can't they just use the normal system like everyone else in the pits, instead of traffic lights... it's pointless!

Why pointless? It was Raikkonen's fault, he left while the red light was lit.


I would rather have the lollypop infront of me, to let me know when it was safe to take off.
If the Ferrari team had used the lollypop man more effectively then he surely would have seen Sutil and stopped Massa.
As for Kimi, he was just stupid.
#61706
A fair analysis, too. That's one of the reasons why I like F1 Fanatic.


The article still hints at the wrong kind of punishments, though. Emphasis should not be placed on penalising the driver, but the team, which is where a fine (and one that actually hurts, not €10,000 which even the smallest teams can afford to pay without worrying so much) is far more appropriate.

I disagree. At the end of the day, Formula One is a team sport and the driver on the track will benefit from infractions, however minor, by the team. The driver, therefore, has to be punished. That's why it was so absurd last season when Hamilton was not disqualified from the drivers' title even though McLaren were adjudged to have been guilty of spying. Hamilton himself may not have done anything wrong, but his on-track performance (car, strategy, etc.) was supposed to have benefited from Ferrari data.

In my view, if the infraction is pretty minor and does not result in any on-track benefits for the team, then fining the driver or team as a whole is the right way to go (as when Kovalainen's McLaren was refueled with a Jerry can with the engine still running). If, however, an illegality brings benefits on the track (i.e. yesterday's pit lane incident) more harsh penalties need to be handed out.
User avatar
By EwanM
#61711
A fair analysis, too. That's one of the reasons why I like F1 Fanatic.


The article still hints at the wrong kind of punishments, though. Emphasis should not be placed on penalising the driver, but the team, which is where a fine (and one that actually hurts, not €10,000 which even the smallest teams can afford to pay without worrying so much) is far more appropriate.

I disagree. At the end of the day, Formula One is a team sport and the driver on the track will benefit from infractions, however minor, by the team. The driver, therefore, has to be punished. That's why it was so absurd last season when Hamilton was not disqualified from the drivers' title even though McLaren were adjudged to have been guilty of spying. Hamilton himself may not have done anything wrong, but his on-track performance (car, strategy, etc.) was supposed to have benefited from Ferrari data.

In my view, if the infraction is pretty minor and does not result in any on-track benefits for the team, then fining the driver or team as a whole is the right way to go (as when Kovalainen's McLaren was refueled with a Jerry can with the engine still running). If, however, an illegality brings benefits on the track (i.e. yesterday's pit lane incident) more harsh penalties need to be handed out.


The FIA surely wouldn't have kicked Hamilton and Alonso out of the world title. They needed to keep the sport popular.
Think how many ordinary people would have turned off F1. And I mean those who had no previous interest in the sport.
#61719
A fair analysis, too. That's one of the reasons why I like F1 Fanatic.


The article still hints at the wrong kind of punishments, though. Emphasis should not be placed on penalising the driver, but the team, which is where a fine (and one that actually hurts, not €10,000 which even the smallest teams can afford to pay without worrying so much) is far more appropriate.

I disagree. At the end of the day, Formula One is a team sport and the driver on the track will benefit from infractions, however minor, by the team. The driver, therefore, has to be punished. That's why it was so absurd last season when Hamilton was not disqualified from the drivers' title even though McLaren were adjudged to have been guilty of spying. Hamilton himself may not have done anything wrong, but his on-track performance (car, strategy, etc.) was supposed to have benefited from Ferrari data.

In my view, if the infraction is pretty minor and does not result in any on-track benefits for the team, then fining the driver or team as a whole is the right way to go (as when Kovalainen's McLaren was refueled with a Jerry can with the engine still running). If, however, an illegality brings benefits on the track (i.e. yesterday's pit lane incident) more harsh penalties need to be handed out.


Refuelling Kovalainen's car brought a benefit on-track - he was able to leave the pits sooner than he would have if the team had made him turn his engine off. You can't have it both ways. Personally, if it's out of the driver's control, how can it be fair for them to lose everything they've worked for?
#61720
Formula One is a team sport. You live and die by what happens in the team!
#61723
Formula One is a team sport. You live and die by what happens in the team!


If that's the case, then if one driver from a team is disqualified from a race for an offence, should the other driver face disqualification for being part of the team?
User avatar
By bud
#61724
Formula One is a team sport. You live and die by what happens in the team!


If that's the case, then if one driver from a team is disqualified from a race for an offence, should the other driver face disqualification for being part of the team?


now youre being silly
#61726
Formula One is a team sport. You live and die by what happens in the team!


If that's the case, then if one driver from a team is disqualified from a race for an offence, should the other driver face disqualification for being part of the team?


now youre being silly


Why am I? It's the same principal. He's part of the team. He didn't have any control over what the other guy did, but he's still part of the team.

Imagine the following scenario:

Hamilton is running first in the race, Massa is in second and Raikkonen is a lap down. Hamilton is coming up to lap Raikkonen, the blue flags are shown, but Raikkonen does not let Hamilton pass him. This goes on until Raikkonen is given the drive-through, but instead of coming in within three laps, he carries on slowing Hamilton down. This allows Massa to close right up on Hamilton. Raikkonen then moves aside, allowing Hamilton through but, crucially, allowing Massa the chance to pass both. He does so and goes on to win the race. Now, Raikkonen should clearly be black flagged but, since Massa gained an advantage, should he also be black flagged?

Bear in mind, Raikkonen was not asked by Massa nor by Ferrari to do this. What do you say?
User avatar
By bud
#61729
all McLaren Fan is saying is that a drivers achievements are down to the team behind the driver. the drivers results are just the pinnacle of alot of peoples hard work.
#61732
Denthúl, you are one of the most amicable people on this forum, but in the last day or two, a rather pompous and arrogant streak within you has reared its head. Taking the huff and twisting somebody's point because that person doesn't agree with you is rather childish.

all McLaren Fan is saying is that a drivers achievements are down to the team behind the driver. the drivers results are just the pinnacle of alot of peoples hard work.

Back on topic, you could also apply Denthúl's logic to the constructors' title. Why should all the mechanics, engineers, management etc. lose out because of a driver's mistake? As bud has pointed out, drivers' success is only the result of a lot of hard work by a lot of people (which is the main reason why I feel the constructors' championship is more meaningful and the most important) and Formula One is about on-track performance. Therefore, as in this case, for instance, if a team releases their driver from the pits when they really shouldn't, the driver has to be punished for this ill-gotten advantage, which will have a negative effect on his team anyway.
#61734
all McLaren Fan is saying is that a drivers achievements are down to the team behind the driver. the drivers results are just the pinnacle of alot of peoples hard work.


Not least their own. And to penalise everybody in the team would be wrong when the mistake is not down to everyone within the team, but perhaps two or three people. Else, the team's other driver, being part of the team, should receive some kind of penalty to go along with it. As it stands, giving Massa a grid-drop or even disqualification (though that would be highly unlikely given the relatively small infraction that incurred) would affect everybody in the team except Raikkonen, would would not suffer from Massa's fate. If you're going to be adamant about punishing the team as a whole, then both drivers surely have to be covered by that, no?

Otherwise, it's not fair on the guys who sit on the pit wall and have nothing to do with what actually goes on within the box. The guys back at the factories who work so hard on the cars yet don't attend the Grand Prix weekend. You have to consider these things very carefully, and place accountability at varying levels. The problem there, however, is that in this case Ferrari don't exactly have anybody they can hold accountable, because their system is electronic rather than a guy standing with a lollipop.

I understand what is being said, I'm just pointing out that it's very hard to actually make this kind of punisment a fair one, because there are a lot of innocent parties that would be affected by it.

Denthúl, you are one of the most amicable people on this forum, but in the last day or two, a rather pompous and arrogant streak within you has reared its head. Taking the huff and twisting somebody's point because that person doesn't agree with you is rather childish.

all McLaren Fan is saying is that a drivers achievements are down to the team behind the driver. the drivers results are just the pinnacle of alot of peoples hard work.

Back on topic, you could also apply Denthúl's logic to the constructors' title. Why should all the mechanics, engineers, management etc. lose out because of a driver's mistake? As bud has pointed out, drivers' success is only the result of a lot of hard work by a lot of people (which is the main reason why I feel the constructors' championship is more meaningful and the most important) and Formula One is about on-track performance. Therefore, as in this case, for instance, if a team releases their driver from the pits when they really shouldn't, the driver has to be punished for this ill-gotten advantage, which will have a negative effect on his team anyway.


I realise this, and there is nothing incorrect about it being a team thing. However, it's still unfair to penalise people who don't have control over something, or at least not in the huge manner that was being talked about, i.e. Massa being stripped of his victory.

And in this particular scenario, it's not like you can say that the team let him go purposefully to get him ahead of Sutil - the system works off all the buttons on the equipment being pressed and the rest is automatic. This highlights once more the flaw in the Ferrari system. It would be more logical to assume that they had actually intended to gain an advantage here if there was a lollipop man, rather than a machine. It's one of the reasons I dislike it, as nobody can be held accountable in such situations (and it makes for an excellent defence in this kind of case), but the reality is that it was simply accidental which is why I felt that, rather than giving him a drive-through, stop and go or time penalty after the race, there should be a fine and a banning of that system.

As for twisting someone's point because they don't agree with me, that's not what I'm doing. I'm trying to show that if you're going to put a penalty on the entire team for the actions of one or two, then it is only fair that it affects the entire team and not just most of it. Which is, again, why there are so many points you can raise on either side of an argument when it comes to penalties. Unfortunately, there is no way of it being perfect, because things are so inter-linked within a team environment. However, refinement would at least help to penalise only the parties involved, to make it fairer.

See our F1 related articles too!