FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

By What's Burning?
#360635
with each restart, Vettel kept losing grownd to the 'bus'.
By What's Burning?
#360639
A very good bus driver happened to be driving that bus. It's an embarrassing situation to be in, not only to be beaten by a bus driver, but to complain that if the circuit was different he would have been able to get past seems rather well, I posted the video elsewhere.
[youtube]qTjto0OQWRU[/youtube]
1:31 to 1:47. actual Monaco footage.
By andrew
#360641
So much for that discussion. If you don't like it I suggest you don't read it - save you the bother of having to do your usual and try and belittle anyone who has the audacity to hold a different view from yourself. Incidently, I don't see you taking on DD who has made quite a bold claim.
By What's Burning?
#360643
:headpat: there, there. I'm sorry you feel that way. It's that sometimes you confound any discussion by refusing to acknowledge facts, all the while steadfastly holding on to your opinion. Which would be fine, in itself, but it's widely accepted that an opinion is something that you accept as yours and yours alone... you have a tendency to try and pass your opinions off as facts everyone should clearly see. Hence the dilemma.

@DD, the stewards must have missed that blatant offense that prevented Vettel from getting by and handily winning the race.
By Hammer278
#360644
So much for that discussion. If you don't like it I suggest you don't read it - save you the bother of having to do your usual and try and belittle anyone who has the audacity to hold a different view from yourself. Incidently, I don't see you taking on DD who has made quite a bold claim.


:crying::crying::crying:

If even Vettel didn't find time to whine about it, it means Lewis' defensive moves were totally legit.
User avatar
By darwin dali
#360646
:headpat: there, there. I'm sorry you feel that way. It's that sometimes you confound any discussion by refusing to acknowledge facts, all the while steadfastly holding on to your opinion. Which would be fine, in itself, but it's widely accepted that an opinion is something that you accept as yours and yours alone... you have a tendency to try and pass your opinions off as facts everyone should clearly see. Hence the dilemma.

@DD, the stewards must have missed that blatant offense that prevented Vettel from getting by and handily winning the race.


I didn't call it a blatant offense, but yeah, they didn't intervene like they sometimes used to in the past by at least calling the team to tell their driver to stop it. But it was only once or twice, so not 'that bad' - at any rate, it did what it was intended for.
User avatar
By racechick
#360657
I didn't think there was room to change direction more than once on the Monaco track?
User avatar
By LewEngBridewell
#360659
I think we can safely say that Seb only looked to be on terms with the Mercs, pace wise, in the early laps. After that, the RBR just didn't seem fast enough.
User avatar
By darwin dali
#360660
I didn't think there was room to change direction more than once on the Monaco track?

On lap 2 he found room right after the Nouvelle Chicane.
User avatar
By darwin dali
#360662
I think we can safely say that Seb only looked to be on terms with the Mercs, pace wise, in the early laps. After that, the RBR just didn't seem fast enough.

No, you can't safely say that. One big concern is overheating when following too closely, so they backed off and managed the tires, basically playing the same game as Mercedes and hoping to jump them during the pit stops.
Plus, later on they looked at the overall situation with FA and KR and realized that there's no point in risking much trying to overtake NR in Monaco when SV and RB are getting way more points than their direct competition.
User avatar
By racechick
#360663
I didn't think there was room to change direction more than once on the Monaco track?

On lap 2 he found room right after the Nouvelle Chicane.

Must only have been a wincy bit or the powers that be would have swooped. You know how they love Lewis :wink:
User avatar
By darwin dali
#360665
I didn't think there was room to change direction more than once on the Monaco track?

On lap 2 he found room right after the Nouvelle Chicane.

Must only have been a wincy bit or the powers that be would have swooped. You know how they love Lewis :wink:

Wasn't a wincy bit, plus it's Monaco, so any double move is immensely effective in those narrow streets.
User avatar
By racechick
#360666
I didn't think there was room to change direction more than once on the Monaco track?

On lap 2 he found room right after the Nouvelle Chicane.

Must only have been a wincy bit or the powers that be would have swooped. You know how they love Lewis :wink:

Wasn't a wincy bit, plus it's Monaco, so any double move is immensely effective in those narrow streets.

Well I didn't see him do anything bad and I was watching closely. Nor did the powers that be, nor did the commentators. If he did, count it as part pay back for the times he's been done unfairly. :)
User avatar
By darwin dali
#360667
I didn't think there was room to change direction more than once on the Monaco track?

On lap 2 he found room right after the Nouvelle Chicane.

Must only have been a wincy bit or the powers that be would have swooped. You know how they love Lewis :wink:

Wasn't a wincy bit, plus it's Monaco, so any double move is immensely effective in those narrow streets.

Well I didn't see him do anything bad and I was watching closely. Nor did the powers that be, nor did the commentators. If he did, count it as part pay back for the times he's been done unfairly. :)

Stateside the commentators talked about it - it probably added to SV's impression of a bulky bus trundling around :hehe:
  • 1
  • 268
  • 269
  • 270
  • 271
  • 272
  • 491

See our F1 related articles too!