- 28 May 12, 06:10#305045The launch is pretty much automatic, were the driver just have to let the clutch go and the software decides how much traction and clutch to use. So its mostly down to the car, and not the driver. Having said that, its typical of Hamilton to complain and not focus on his driving. Most other drivers just get on with it, as the understand it cant be undone.
Yes the Mclaren pit stop was a second slower than RB and Ferrari, and it matters allot. However in this case, he lost out to Alonso as he had a slow out lap, while Alonso had a great in lap. I think this race really showed the difference between a driver like Alonso and Hamilton. Alonso knew overtaking was difficult, and therefore "saved" tires and just keeping in touch with Hamilton until it really mattered. Just before the pit stops, he closed the gap and then pushed when Hamilton pitted. But the 3-4 seconds gap, was mainly due to the problem of getting the tire temperature up after the pit stops. As we saw Webber lost out to Vettel the first laps after pitting, even he had new tires and Vettel had tires that was around 30 laps old.
So to summarize:
*Hamilton lost the position to Alonso due to his out lap.
* Hamilton lost the position to Vettel due to his pit stop was a second slower and his out lap was slow. Had either of these not happened, he would have been infront of Vettel.
I do agree with the people saying it was a boring race. Yes its exciting to see the cars being so close to the barriers, but not for 78 laps! Todays F1 cars are just to quick and have to good breaks to allow overtaking. If you go back 10 years, it was possible to overtake on the straight and after the tunnel. Yes it was hard, but possible. Now you have to dive in, close your eyes and hope for the best. Maybe it could be an idea, not to allow KERS in this race. That would give better overtaking opportunities on the straight, as they first drivers cant use KERS to counter the attack from the car behind.