- 27 Jul 09, 11:21#137022One thing the stewards have been consistenly failing to do is at least summoning Hamilton for his turn 1 antics.
He's made a habit of diving head first and reckelessly into turn one, whenever he's not on front row, disregarding and putting into risk the other drivers' AND his own race.
Now, im saying he deserves a WARNING. Dont make anything more of it now....
Webber's drive through was reasonable. Kimi's incidents have mostly been some driver going over aggressive and bumping into him, defending his position rather than him doing something reckless to endarger other drivers.
.
Hamilton has been punished for a first corner incident.(Incorrectly in my view) He's done nothing recently that warrants a Warning!! Are you referring to him using KERS??
Surely Fuji last year is what he's talking about, and he got a penalty for that i thought.

On this topic, the key differences between Raikkonen and Webber's incidents are that Mark hit Rubens on a relatively open bit of track whereas Raikkonen was surrounded by cars, and didn't hit anybody. I don't think either really deserved any action, but i can see why an argument for giving a penalty to Webber could be made. I'm sure my view would be different if a drive through had cost him the race though!
Rising number one of Formula 1, Juan - Juan, one wonders should Juan only win one Formula 1 one year, would Juan have won that one in round one, Juan??