About Us
Launched in 2005, this website started out as a dedicated F1 forum (hence FORUM…ula1.com) offering debate and banter on all aspects of Formula One and other motorsport categories.
Read moreDiscuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans
to call it a piece of road jewellery shows your knowledge of anything 4 wheels so no point going any further with you!
But I must say the McLarenF1 a supercar was designed in the early 90s while you're comparing it to a brand new GT car..... Well done again sparky
My knowledge of cars may not be as good as yours but I stand by my opinion of calling it "road jewellery" with it's gold lined engine bay and gold plated toolkit. I'm sure you'll come back with a raft of technical innovations but $2m for a road car, it's like having a diamond ring, people buy it for it's posing value not what the car can do on the track.
I am not ignorant of the McLaren F1's prowess, I have read the technical sheets and seen how it performs on the track and I still don't rate it very highly, infact I would rate the Ferrari F40 over the F1; and the Ferrari was built five years before the McLaren F1, that's not comparing modern machinery to 15 year old machinery is it?
It's my preference, because it's different to yours doesn't make it wrong; get over it!
to call it a piece of road jewellery shows your knowledge of anything 4 wheels so no point going any further with you!
But I must say the McLarenF1 a supercar was designed in the early 90s while you're comparing it to a brand new GT car..... Well done again sparky
My knowledge of cars may not be as good as yours but I stand by my opinion of calling it "road jewellery" with it's gold lined engine bay and gold plated toolkit. I'm sure you'll come back with a raft of technical innovations but $2m for a road car, it's like having a diamond ring, people buy it for it's posing value not what the car can do on the track.
I am not ignorant of the McLaren F1's prowess, I have read the technical sheets and seen how it performs on the track and I still don't rate it very highly, infact I would rate the Ferrari F40 over the F1; and the Ferrari was built five years before the McLaren F1, that's not comparing modern machinery to 15 year old machinery is it?
It's my preference, because it's different to yours doesn't make it wrong; get over it!
ITS $2m BECUASE ITS RARE!!!
IT WON LeMans Out Right Beating the Prototypes.
AND ITS A BLOODY ROAD CAR.
It was still racing internationaly until 2005. (thats 10 years old btw)
God your just moaning for moaning sake.
to call it a peice of road jewellary makes you look like and utter
Wow, it seems like I am getting under the skin of the McLaren fanboys... I'm sorry if you can't accept my opinion but I am not going to change it to please others.
Who cares if it won Le Mans? that has no bearing on the road car! And I am not moaning; I am expressing any opinion, an exchange of opinions, isn't that what forums are for?
Expensive cars in general are more a status symbol than anything else, or as some people think an extension of the owners pen1s!
There are far more rarer cars than the McLaren F1; how come they aren't worth $2m? It's only worth that because people are willing to pay that much for it!
if people have the money to pay that much for a car; then all power to them! I personally wouldn't spend that much even if I had $2m to spend!
I care? your pissing me with your comments there not really opinions there just silly comments.
Of Course LE-mans has bearing on a road car because it was the same chassis!
Again a barrage of silly comments.
And People want them because its a really special car.
"ooo for $2m you could buy a nissan gtr and thats a much better car"
You obviously don't understand why a few people are sad about this because your abit slow or perhaps you have the feeling of a brick i don't know - btw there just opinions not insults
So when you come in here and go "$2mil pounds for a car? the Nissan GTR is better than that!!" you just look silly.
Mate if you go on a forum and bag a legendary car then what do you expect?
I think you guys are taking it a little too seriously, if he thinks its a "road jewelry" than who cares?
I'm sure that the F1 would beat the GTR hands down on the track but it's not all about going fast around a track; it's about the driving experience.
I'm sure that the F1 would beat the GTR hands down on the track but it's not all about going fast around a track; it's about the driving experience.
if going fast around the track isnt your kind of driving experience then yeah the F1 isnt for you. Maybe go for a Camry!
if going fast around the track isnt your kind of driving experience then yeah the F1 isnt for you. Maybe go for a Camry!
prob drives a diesel.
toast the children on top of the engine!
if going fast around the track isnt your kind of driving experience then yeah the F1 isnt for you. Maybe go for a Camry!
Outright speed isn't so important to me; I enjoy G-Forces so something small and light usually works for me, I quite like the Lotus Elise or Exige, it may only do 150mph but it goes through corners better than many more expensive sports cars. Besides if driving on public roads what good is 240mph when you are restricted to 70mph?
See our F1 related articles too!