FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
User avatar
By Denthúl
#95607
From F1 Live:

Following a recent visit to the Barcelona test garages, controversial technical features on some F1 cars were inspected by the FIA's Charlie Whiting.

Subsequently, the 30cm-high cockpit fairing fins on Williams' FW31 disappeared on safety grounds, and the much smaller fins on the 2009 BMW Sauber are also believed to have been scrapped ahead of the 2009 season.

But it is understood that, while the rear diffusers of the Brawn, Toyota and Williams cars have been the most controversial of the pre-season, the teams have not been asked to change those designs.

"They used a loophole (in the regulations) that was always there," the governing body's technical delegate Whiting is quoted as saying by Auto Motor und Sport.

"Additionally, we can understand that other teams have a different view," he added.

The threat of formal protests lodged by the teams' rivals in Australia thus remains.
"I guarantee whoever wins the races in Melbourne will be told they are cheating, and it doesn't matter who it is," Bernie Ecclestone commented on Wednesday.

Williams' Sam Michael is surprised the other teams have not simply picked up the concept rather than complain about it. "It would be relatively simple to copy this solution," the Australian said.

"It surprises me that more teams have not done so up to now," he is quoted as saying by the German magazine.

Source: GMM
© CAPSIS International


I guess somebody always slips up. Renault have done it twice in two years. Last year with the engine loopholes and this year with the diffuser. It would be terrible for the sport if these diffusers were banned as I think it would make for healthy competition if Brawn, Williams and Toyota were (in the early stages of the season, at least) fighting for the championship to some extent.

I agree with Michael on this one. I, too, am pretty surprised more teams didn't pick up on the loophole.
#95639
What are all these loopholes doing in the pherkin' regulations in the first place? How hard can it be to write regulations that actually regulate like they are supposed to? It's like Papa Mosley has deliberately hidden loopholes in all the regulations like some sort of stupid easter egg hunt.
User avatar
By 7UpJordan
#95642
I hope the FW31's diffuser stays legal, rumour has it the FW31 and the Toyota's diffuser can generate more downforce than the 2006 Ferrari.
#95677
What are all these loopholes doing in the pherkin' regulations in the first place? How hard can it be to write regulations that actually regulate like they are supposed to? It's like Papa Mosley has deliberately hidden loopholes in all the regulations like some sort of stupid easter egg hunt.


It's like the US tax code. Part of the fun I guess...
User avatar
By bud
#95678
well if Charlie has given the 3 teams Diffusers the thumbs up already then i wont expect any protest to go anywhere in Melbourne.

more so hastily copying for the second race... :hehe:
#95682
well if Charlie has given the 3 teams Diffusers the thumbs up already then i wont expect any protest to go anywhere in Melbourne.

more so hastily copying for the second race... :hehe:


Charlie gave the thumbs up to McLaren's McBrake. Still got banned at the first race. Mass dampers were also legal for a long time, then got banned.
User avatar
By bud
#95683
well if Charlie has given the 3 teams Diffusers the thumbs up already then i wont expect any protest to go anywhere in Melbourne.

more so hastily copying for the second race... :hehe:


Charlie gave the thumbs up to McLaren's McBrake. Still got banned at the first race. Mass dampers were also legal for a long time, then got banned.
Yeah good point but that shows the incompetence of the FIA where even their head technical delegate is over ruled by local scrutineers
Hello, new member here

Yeah, not very active here, unfortunately. Is it […]

See our F1 related articles too!