FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

[hrvach]

not paying attention and making mistakes is always the same, there are no excuses. racing, normal driving, driving through boxes. i wouldn't have no objections on hamiltons penalty if kimi was penalized in monaco, but this way i just have to. it is not fair

[Snuggles]

No,No,No i totally disagree, Kimi drove in a wet spot? which wasn't his fault, Lewis's team said there's a red light? i guess his driving is exacly like his fathers!!! Also, if you look at it in other ways, Kimi would have won, i'm not single sighted, but Why was Kimi so slow in the beginning stint? heavy fueling!! but to be honest the track is having problems, you can pull the track up? plus it's only Round 7, Th French GP will prove different? plus with Hamilton 10 places down i feel a Ferrari 1-2 Then Massa Or Kimi will take the WDC

[al4x]

basically i think its cause kimi didnt break a clear cut rule, hamilton did, and thats how the fia see it

[al4x]

kimi wasnt heavy fueled, not that much anyway, he was in at the same time as hamilton

[hrvach]

and what rule did hamilton brake? yes he crashed into kimi but he did not break any rules. would someone also be penalized if someone also crashed into sutils car under safety car?

[Mikep99]

not paying attention and making mistakes is always the same, there are no excuses. racing, normal driving, driving through boxes. i wouldn't have no objections on hamiltons penalty if kimi was penalized in monaco, but this way i just have to. it is not fair

Kimi says it best mate.

Obviously, anyone can make mistakes, as I did two weeks ago in Monaco, but it's one thing to make a mistake at two hundred per hour but another to hit a car stopped at a red light.

If you don't understand this I think it may be because you don't want to.

[al4x]

and what rule did hamilton brake? yes he crashed into kimi but he did not break any rules. would someone also be penalized if someone also crashed into sutils car under safety car?

if kimis car wasnt there hed have gone through the red light

[Snuggles]

Not to be the B*stard of you all, and i know we all support different teams? but since i was 6 i've suppoted Ferrari, and i'll admit a few things to you, FIA do give Ferrari special treatment! but why wouldn't they? look at the cash they can splash around? Also if a few people drop a couple of Million on bernie Eccelstones desk, i think he'd quit clearly turn his head....it's unfair with what happened to Sutill, fully agreed, but if you said who's more superior, Ferrari or Mclaren in the respect of who is more favoured by Eccelstone & Mosley, Then it's Ferrari, Massa or The Iceman didn't say anuything about Mosley in the umpalumpa scandal either? but Mclaren & Everyone else did..hense why he seems to drop bombs on the team

[Snuggles]

LMAOO!!! I read that!!! Kimi was unimpressed...other thing you can see it as he deliberatley hit him...Kimi even points to the red light..Lewis has got to big for his Racing boots...and soon people are going to see that...why is his fan base so small?? because he's arragant!!!

[texasmr2]

Yah we all know you like the look of the bold text and different color's Snug's but let's not revert back to 3 month's ago ok.

PS,
Also your siggy pic is oversized so please read the forum rule's.

[Rivelution]

and what rule did hamilton brake? yes he crashed into kimi but he did not break any rules. would someone also be penalized if someone also crashed into sutils car under safety car?

You see the difference is that Kimi's was unavoidable because he hit a wet spot. Hamilton's was totally avoidable (all he had to do was pay attention) and ran into the back of Raikkonen. If you still dont think its fair, look at Australia. Nakajima was penalised 10 grid spots for running into the back of Kubica which was easily avoidable. If you still dont think thats fair then you are just making yourself look like a Hamilton lamb.

[al4x]

Yah we all know you like the look of the bold text Snug's but let's not revert back to 3 month's ago ok.

oh dear tex, i would want to be a mod today!

[hrvach]

if kimis car wasn't there??? but it was there and hamilton did not go through red light, ergo he did not break any rules. i think because hamilton crashed into kimi and them kimi was pushed through red light he should be punished. hamiltons penalty is pure stupidity nd it shows how FIA favors ferrari and hates mclaren, everyone knows and sees that but none will speak it out loud

[Snuggles]

Tex ya lost me bud :O i'm being nice matey no arguing, just straight nice conversation making

[bmwpower]

and what rule did hamilton brake?

Red means stop in almost every country and race tracks, Kimi and Kubica stopped, LH and Nico never did stopped only after they slammed into each other. We've seen a few incidents this year where drivers slamming into each other ON THE TRACK because they didn't brake fast enough, there was no red light flashing telling them to stop. Alsonso almost rear ended Nick at the hairpin, if he did it was a racing incident because you can see his wheels locking up while braking, Kimi's wheels was also locking up while braking when he hit Sutil, these drivers ATTEMPTED to brake, something neither Nico or LH did. Also, Kimi was in the position for points when he was forced to retired, Sutil wasn't in position for points because he was due to serve a drive through penalty in Monace.