FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

User avatar
By racechick
#328773
All I heard here was madcap theories and baseless speculation.


Then you didn't listen properly.


So I guess half the forum regulars didn't listen properly then. :rolleyes:

Read what I wrote properly - he's isolated to an extent as he is moving to a competitor. Perfectly normal. But you have been telling us all season that McLaren have been conspirring against him which is total and utter :bs: .


Oh Andrew :wave: I can't speak for half the forum but this is why I say you don't listen. You're back on your conspiracy :bs: , despite being told several times that we categorically DO NOT think McLaren are running a conspiracy against Lewis Hamilton. that would be dumb even by McLarens current standards.
We did think lots was amiss at Mclaren, and put forward possible reasons for this. and one of them was Lewis' increasing isolation, we even put forward suggestions as to why he might be getting isolated. If only you'd listened then :shrug:, you'd be ahead of the game now, even ahead of Kravitz :thumbup:
By andrew
#328777
You're the one with the conspiracies, not me. I've not created any stories about McLaren, Whitmarsh or Button. :banghead:
User avatar
By f1ea
#328780
I just see Whitmarsh's "praise" of Lewis' drive in Korea as a bit disingenuous. I agree that he drove an amazing race for a point considering he was driving a broken car that was eating rubber faster than Cookie Monster in the NABISCO cookie factory. But to suddenly laud and gush over him to the point of almost proposing marriage during a time when Lewis has had these coincidental back to back suspension "failures" on the back of transmission failures gives me pause. Strikes me as overcompensating...a bit nefarious to he honest. Where was all this man crush when Lewis delivered some phenomenal drives...like Canada and other races? (Going back to some of those interviews, Whitmarsh did praise Lewis but seemingly jumped quickly to Jenson and spent most of the time talking about Jenson still working hard to come to grips with the tyres. Not a pun if it's a fact.)

Martin, Lewis is leaving...just ride out the next few races and call it a season (a wasted one). Lewis is gonna do what Lewis does best...extract every ounce of performance regardless of whether you give him a world-beater of a race car or Grampa Sammy's donkey cart. If you want to play games, Jenson likes games. If Constructors point$ are valuable to you, provide a reliable and quick car...Lewis will get you the trophies and points. But for goodness sakes, pass on the post-race rubbish...please!

Now that I've gotten that off me chest...ooo, what's this? Cookies! :P

I'm just saying...


Totally agree. Absolute b.s. by Whitmarsh and company.


:yes: +1
Too much too late :thumbdown:
good post Team Maclarn F1


Oh Andrew :wave: I can't speak for half the forum but this is why I say you don't listen. You're back on your conspiracy :bs: , despite being told several times that we categorically DO NOT think McLaren are running a conspiracy against Lewis Hamilton. that would be dumb even by McLarens current standards.


Contradictory?

It's all i have to say [WINKING FACE]
User avatar
By racechick
#328792
No contradiction at all. Favouritism, preference for one driver, errors, poor systems, poor strategies, incompetence, poor management, etc, etc. Conspiracy? no absolutely not.
User avatar
By f1ea
#328794
No contradiction at all. Favouritism, preference for one driver, errors, poor systems, poor strategies, incompetence, poor management, etc, etc. Conspiracy? no absolutely not.


"coincidental "failures""
I like those words. Absolutely nothing misleading about them.

Admit it, the only thing that kept you guys frank was the fact that Jenson got "coincidentally" screwed in Korea. :)
By Hammer278
#328795
No contradiction at all. Favouritism, preference for one driver, errors, poor systems, poor strategies, incompetence, poor management, etc, etc. Conspiracy? no absolutely not.


"coincidental "failures""
I like those words. Absolutely nothing misleading about them.

Admit it, the only thing that kept you guys frank was the fact that Jenson got "coincidentally" screwed in Korea. :)


How did he get screwed in Korea? He screwed it himself in qualifying and ended up risking himself in midfield...we full well know if he didn't get divebombed by Kobayashi, he would've easily beat Lewis with a very 'fit' suspension. :hehe:
User avatar
By racechick
#328796
No contradiction at all. Favouritism, preference for one driver, errors, poor systems, poor strategies, incompetence, poor management, etc, etc. Conspiracy? no absolutely not.


"coincidental "failures""
I like those words. Absolutely nothing misleading about them.

Admit it, the only thing that kept you guys frank was the fact that Jenson got "coincidentally" screwed in Korea. :)

those weren't my words, though I agree with the gist of the post. Yes lots of coincidental failures, well just lots of failures.
User avatar
By f1ea
#328800
So it was a great post that you agree with.... yet based on a fundamental "flaw". Nice.

Again... face it, it would be really though for you guys to decide on where to put the "" if the Korea hand't been so full of "coincidences".

But as it turns out: Lewis almost "coincidentally" miss Q1; and Jenson "coincidentally" ran into a yellow flag on his last Q lap, then "coincidentally" got taken out in a race where Lewis "coincidentally" got an "unfit" suspension....

But don't worry, 4 more races to go for you guys to sort out your "" placement.
Last edited by f1ea on 21 Oct 12, 18:40, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By f1ea
#328805
Oh my, the Lewis thread is a long one. :yes:


:yes:
In no other thread can you find pit lane crashes, twitter sagas, conspiracy theories, championships decided in the last corner of the last gp after team orders, bromances and lawn mowing.... Oh and pussycat dolls.

I admit it. I'm a fan.
:D

Edit: :rimshot:
Last edited by f1ea on 21 Oct 12, 18:41, edited 1 time in total.
By What's Burning?
#328807
it's always more fun to hang out with the popular kids. :wink:
User avatar
By racechick
#328808
So it was a great post that you agree with.... yet based on a fundamental "flaw". Nice.

Again... face it, it would be really though for you guys to decide on where to put the "" if the Korea hand't been so full of "coincidences".

But as it turns out: Lewis almost "coincidentally" miss Q1; and Jenson "coincidentally" ran into a yellow flag on his last Q lap, then "coincidentally" got taken out in a race where Lewis "coincidentally" got a bad suspension....

But don't worry, 4 more races to go for you guys to sort out your "" placement.


IM not really following your logic. I can't even remember what happened in Korea so your comments are wasted on me. Can't follow all your Coincidences either.
I Agreed with the sentiment of a post yes. it was based on a flaw? Was it? I didn't notice a flaw in the post.
By andrew
#328809
it's always more fun to hand out with the popular kids. :wink:


How would you know what's popular with kids? :eek:
By What's Burning?
#328811
If I could only articulate it andrew, it just happens naturally.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
By scotty
#328817
it's always more fun to hand out with the popular kids. :wink:


How would you know what's popular with kids? :eek:


*insert Jimmy Saville joke here*
  • 1
  • 184
  • 185
  • 186
  • 187
  • 188
  • 491

See our F1 related articles too!