- 23 Nov 14, 00:51#426742
Is this a trick question???
are you serious???
Ok the joke is on me, but whats the punch line
You gotta stop relying on Wiki for everything
Ok lets start with the basics - you want a DQ or penalty for cheating? How about evidence of cheating? We dont actually need the ferrari FIA to issue a penalty or for the ferrari stooge Todt to issue a penalty. We just need proof that they cheated. Which I will provide starting with the basics
You can then say it wasnt cheating by proving it wasnt cheating, in this case I would expect a statement from the FIA or a tribunal to categorically state that they were not cheating - like I did with Merc
So Ferrari cheated in a clumsily cynical unsporting and shameful manner - you are invited to prove they didnt
2014 Monster 26x Bookie Mugger
2015, 2016 WDC: LH44
McLaren have cheated in the past as well too, shall we label Ron Dennis a cheat too?
Or shall we just agree that all top teams and drivers push the rules to their advantage and in their pursuit for victory sometimes push the rules too far
You probably knowslightly more that the other guy so please refer to the reply above
Ok then, Einstein, please give me an example of when Ferrari have been disqualified or penalised for cheating. I can give two examples for McLaren. 2007 (the biggest cheating scandal either) and 2009 Australia. The only DQ involving Ferrari was Schumacher, and that was nothing to do with the team. It was a mistake by Schumacher that he later admitted he regretted.
Is this a trick question???
are you serious???
Ok the joke is on me, but whats the punch line
You gotta stop relying on Wiki for everything
Ok lets start with the basics - you want a DQ or penalty for cheating? How about evidence of cheating? We dont actually need the ferrari FIA to issue a penalty or for the ferrari stooge Todt to issue a penalty. We just need proof that they cheated. Which I will provide starting with the basics
You can then say it wasnt cheating by proving it wasnt cheating, in this case I would expect a statement from the FIA or a tribunal to categorically state that they were not cheating - like I did with Merc
That is not to say that there is something fundamentally crooked about the team from Maranello – in fact their best defence may well be that their cheating on Sunday, and its shoddy aftermath, was so splendidly maladroit, so heroically and naively hamfisted, that underneath all the Clouseau clumsiness there must somewhere lurk a sheepish honesty.
Team orders which interfere with the race were banned in 2002 after, yes, Ferrari ordered Rubens Barrichello to move over for Michael Schumacher. Many hoary paddock voices say the rule is unworkable and is flouted on a regular basis the entire length of the pitlane.
But the problem for F1 in general and Ferrari in particular is that what happened on Sunday represented the worst aspect of cheating. We are cynically resigned to the fouling footballer, to the cricketer who claims the catch even though he knows the ball has bounced or not touched the bat. But the sportsman who deliberately underachieves – who subverts the bible‑sworn evidence of our own eyes, who by decreeing that seeing is no longer believing destroys the integrity of himself, his sport and his witness – is a more sinister being altogether.
What also shames Ferrari is that the instruction to Massa was not made by the team principal himself, Stefano Domenicali, a man under intense pressure, but by the driver's trusted mechanic, the Englishman Rob Smedley.
After watching five hours of the BBC's excellent, digitally extended coverage of Sunday's race I still did not know who had won. We may not know that until next month, following a meeting of the World Motor Sport Council – presided over, by the way, by the former Ferrari principal Jean Todt, who was in charge during the previous fiasco eight years ago.
So Ferrari cheated in a clumsily cynical unsporting and shameful manner - you are invited to prove they didnt

2014 Monster 26x Bookie Mugger
2015, 2016 WDC: LH44