FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

#301210
Regarding the PF1 piece . . . , what a piece of trash. Glad to see it's getting trashed like it deserves over at PF1.

A lot of good thoughts are getting through, however, but can't see that lasting for long, if things continue on the trajectory they are on at the moment. . . . (meaning someone thought it was time to write a derogatory, apologist piece -- but that seems to only have raised more legitimate questions :yes: ).

Regarding the forthcoming suppression of viewpoints in the mainstream outlets, I know of one particularly insightful chap :laugh: , who was axed off one leading corporatist site for voicing some well-worded objections to what he saw unfolding after the first race!

In particular, I recall him saying something like: "those cars weren't the same . . . , if you are going to fool with his car, at least make it close . . . ."

Turns out of course, that he was absolutely correct, as Lewis' start program was changed (what else was different, we don't really know, do we?).

And on and on and on it goes. Something strange happens, people start to comment on it, others come along and try to convince discerning fans that they didn't really see what they know they saw. if the outcry becomes unmanageable, the censorship begins. That's how the game is played. . . .

Hats off to Forumula One so far, but maybe you are still just under the radar. If that's the case, expect the voice(s) we know and love here to go by the wayside soon enough. But then again, maybe the way to raise your profile is to let so-called loonies (like me), have their say. :laugh:

Peace and love, y'all.



Please tell me what medication you are on. I need to get me some.
#301220
Regarding the PF1 piece . . . , what a piece of trash. Glad to see it's getting trashed like it deserves over at PF1.

A lot of good thoughts are getting through, however, but can't see that lasting for long, if things continue on the trajectory they are on at the moment. . . . (meaning someone thought it was time to write a derogatory, apologist piece -- but that seems to only have raised more legitimate questions :yes: ).

Regarding the forthcoming suppression of viewpoints in the mainstream outlets, I know of one particularly insightful chap :laugh: , who was axed off one leading corporatist site for voicing some well-worded objections to what he saw unfolding after the first race!

In particular, I recall him saying something like: "those cars weren't the same . . . , if you are going to fool with his car, at least make it close . . . ."

Turns out of course, that he was absolutely correct, as Lewis' start program was changed (what else was different, we don't really know, do we?).

And on and on and on it goes. Something strange happens, people start to comment on it, others come along and try to convince discerning fans that they didn't really see what they know they saw. if the outcry becomes unmanageable, the censorship begins. That's how the game is played. . . .

Hats off to Forumula One so far, but maybe you are still just under the radar. If that's the case, expect the voice(s) we know and love here to go by the wayside soon enough. But then again, maybe the way to raise your profile is to let so-called loonies (like me), have their say. :laugh:

Peace and love, y'all.



Please tell me what medication you are on. I need to get me some.


Having read that I don't think he is on medication, he needs it though! :rofl:
#301221
Look at his name..He's on a truth drug. It opens your eyes to things you'd like swept under the carpet. You guys should try some, but be warned, once you do, there's no turning back :rofl::rofl:
#301226
Let me explain this to you guys, 'cause you don't seem to get it:

(1) I don't give a :censored: ;

(2) I don't give a :censored: ;

(3) I don't give a :censored: ;

So (4), because I don't give a :censored: , it means your petty browbeating can be directed at me, rather than at someone who does give a :censored: , and we win. :clap::laugh: Plus, in any event, I find this stuff hilarious, so thanks for the entertainment :smallthumbup: .

Btw, you really think I can't anticipate these responses from a mile away, so that really makes it funny to me. Anyway, thanks for brightening up my day, glad I could do likewise. :bouncy1::bouncy1::laugh:

This site has so many off-the-wall smilies.
#301228
Look at his name..He's on a truth drug. It opens your eyes to things you'd like swept under the carpet. You guys should try some, but be warned, once you do, there's no turning back :rofl::rofl:


You got that right. :laugh:

But be forewarned RC, you don't want to be lumped in with the likes of me. Careful. :thumbup:
#301236
Let me explain this to you guys, 'cause you don't seem to get it:

(1) I don't give a :censored: ;

(2) I don't give a :censored: ;

(3) I don't give a :censored: ;

So (4), because I don't give a :censored: , it means your petty browbeating can be directed at me, rather than at someone who does give a :censored: , and we win. :clap::laugh: Plus, in any event, I find this stuff hilarious, so thanks for the entertainment :smallthumbup: .

Btw, you really think I can't anticipate these responses from a mile away, so that really makes it funny to me. Anyway, thanks for brightening up my day, glad I could do likewise. :bouncy1::bouncy1::laugh:

This site has so many off-the-wall smilies.


Wow, you are so wise and intelligent. I only wish I could be like you.

:hammer:
#301242
Wow, you are so wise and intelligent. I only wish I could be like you.

:hammer:


It does take time. . . . :laugh:

:yikes: Wait a minute, I don't think you really meant that! :laugh:


In all seriousness, Im not saying you are a complete loon. I wouldnt be surprised if some of what you are trying to imply is true. However thats my issue with you...

You never come outright, and state in plain English what it is the f*** you are talking about, or any evidence to back that up - you just talk in riddles and half secentences and you merely TRY to imply things without ever actaully saying anything. You talk of 'certain someone' and 'the voices' etc. If you truely believe in something, try and man up and name people. If you are worried about talking about taboo users, or incidents, then dont bother bringing it up.

All the above kinda proves to me that you actaullay have nothing to say, and are just trying to sound far more intelligent and 'in the know' than you actually are.
#301253
Hamilton wants to test the car at the coming Mugello test rather than leave it to the test drivers as was planned. He says he wants to find out why the pace is there for quali and drops so much for the race.

http://www.gpupdate.net/en/f1-news/2777 ... ht-change/
  • 1
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 491
Hello, new member here

Yeah, not very active here, unfortunately. Is it […]

See our F1 related articles too!