- 07 Sep 08, 21:58#63425
To be honest, it was not appropriate. There should have been no penalty whatsoever. I've explained this before but, seeing as you appear to be new, I shall go through it again for your benefit
Basically, throughout the entirity of this Formula 1 season, there have been unsafe pit releases at almost every Grand Prix. Nobody has been penalised for these. Therefore, to issue Massa with a penalty would prove inconsistent.
On the other hand, people have previously been penalised for this kind of incident in GP2, therefore to not penalise Senna would prove inconsistent.
You see?
More like more than half of the field, seeing as the majority of drivers had some kind of off-track excursion today. Which is why the ruling needs to be much clearer. To simply say that they must use only the track is not acceptable, when going off the track can often be unavoidable.
Last week - They didnt crash in the pit so no need to penalise.
That is inaccurate: a financial penalty of 10,000 Euros was imposed on Massa as a result of his pit-lane incident in Valencia. I think it was appropriate.
Why is it appropriate to only fine Massa when Bruno Senna was given a drive thru penalty for something similar in yesterday's GP2 race?
To be honest, it was not appropriate. There should have been no penalty whatsoever. I've explained this before but, seeing as you appear to be new, I shall go through it again for your benefit

Basically, throughout the entirity of this Formula 1 season, there have been unsafe pit releases at almost every Grand Prix. Nobody has been penalised for these. Therefore, to issue Massa with a penalty would prove inconsistent.
On the other hand, people have previously been penalised for this kind of incident in GP2, therefore to not penalise Senna would prove inconsistent.
You see?

True, so what about Kimi a couple of corners later who used more or less all of the run off area to keep his foot flat to the floor and rejoin about half a second behind Hamilton.
More like more than half of the field, seeing as the majority of drivers had some kind of off-track excursion today. Which is why the ruling needs to be much clearer. To simply say that they must use only the track is not acceptable, when going off the track can often be unavoidable.
