- 27 Nov 08, 07:39#82660
thats exactly the way i feel too, and have mentioned before that they should have reviews of race rules and regs a minimum of every two years. i understand f1 should remain update with the progress of development, but it just seems we are getting major changes every year, which in turn puts extra costs on the constructors in terms of re-development.
the whole story is a farce.
Not sure if this was discussed. Bernie wants driver to go for it. Well don't restrict them. An engine has to last 2 races and a gear box 4 (i believe next season) of course a driver is going to conserve his equipment with rules as they are.
Bernie wants to see them race well let the drivers have a fresh engine for every race this way no one has to conserve their equpment and coast to the end. He want it more competitive, don't keep changing the rules. Because the rich team can adjust quicker than the poor ones. Keep the things the same for a long time and the poor team will get there.
thats exactly the way i feel too, and have mentioned before that they should have reviews of race rules and regs a minimum of every two years. i understand f1 should remain update with the progress of development, but it just seems we are getting major changes every year, which in turn puts extra costs on the constructors in terms of re-development.
the whole story is a farce.
