FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

Formula One related discussion.
#151194
not to be picky but F1 wind tunnel testing is only allowed with 60% scale models. :P

Are you sure? I thought it was 60% or smaller.

Also...That car looks slick. :thumbup:
#151251
not to be picky but F1 wind tunnel testing is only allowed with 60% scale models. :P

Are you sure? I thought it was 60% or smaller.

Also...That car looks slick. :thumbup:


only going on what i was told at MTC's wind tunnel. i guess it could be smaller but for best results 60% is the bee knees.
#151261
not to be picky but F1 wind tunnel testing is only allowed with 60% scale models. :P

Are you sure? I thought it was 60% or smaller.

Also...That car looks slick. :thumbup:


only going on what i was told at MTC's wind tunnel. i guess it could be smaller but for best results 60% is the bee knees.


interesting, did the guys there explain why 60% is better than full scale? :scratchchin:
#151263
not to be picky but F1 wind tunnel testing is only allowed with 60% scale models. :P

Are you sure? I thought it was 60% or smaller.

Also...That car looks slick. :thumbup:


only going on what i was told at MTC's wind tunnel. i guess it could be smaller but for best results 60% is the bee knees.


interesting, did the guys there explain why 60% is better than full scale? :scratchchin:


well he didnt say better than full scale but apparently 60% is better than even 80%. I dont really understand how but im not one to question engineers. :hehe:
#151264
not to be picky but F1 wind tunnel testing is only allowed with 60% scale models. :P

Are you sure? I thought it was 60% or smaller.

Also...That car looks slick. :thumbup:


only going on what i was told at MTC's wind tunnel. i guess it could be smaller but for best results 60% is the bee knees.


interesting, did the guys there explain why 60% is better than full scale? :scratchchin:


well he didnt say better than full scale but apparently 60% is better than even 80%. I dont really understand how but im not one to question engineers. :hehe:


Ah right, fair enough. I am intrigued. :P
#151540
The car looks pretty neat, but, as somebody else has already said, it doesn't look very well developed. The speed of the MP4-24 around February this year suddenly doesn't look as though it could be so embarrassing.
Hello, new member here

Yeah, not very active here, unfortunately. Is it […]

See our F1 related articles too!