- 31 May 09, 20:18#122872

Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point. 
that wasn't as silly as Damon Hill winning it



Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans
that wasn't as silly as Damon Hill winning it
Raikkonen's comment is just legendary, i thought this was amusingly bizarre though -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1p3yl0dK08s
that wasn't as silly as Damon Hill winning it
that wasn't as silly as Damon Hill winning itWhat's the logic there?
that wasn't as silly as Damon Hill winning itWhat's the logic there?
well Jacques was faster than Damon, basically. Neither of them would have won a WDC in equal cars against Schumacher and Hakkinen and the like but Damon has to be one of the least talented drivers to ever win the WDC. At least Jacques had some serious raw speed.
that wasn't as silly as Damon Hill winning itWhat's the logic there?
well Jacques was faster than Damon, basically. Neither of them would have won a WDC in equal cars against Schumacher and Hakkinen and the like but Damon has to be one of the least talented drivers to ever win the WDC. At least Jacques had some serious raw speed.
Like I said before, the team turned against Damon and favoured Jacques - except for the outgoing Adrian Newey who supported Damon to the last lap at Suzuka.
that wasn't as silly as Damon Hill winning itWhat's the logic there?
well Jacques was faster than Damon, basically. Neither of them would have won a WDC in equal cars against Schumacher and Hakkinen and the like but Damon has to be one of the least talented drivers to ever win the WDC. At least Jacques had some serious raw speed.
Like I said before, the team turned against Damon and favoured Jacques - except for the outgoing Adrian Newey who supported Damon to the last lap at Suzuka.
Wasnt that partly why Newey left? Because he had no say and was pissed off at the treatment of Damon?
Oh C'mon Damon can't be that bad.Well I know what you mean but there has to be worse champions than he.
that wasn't as silly as Damon Hill winning itWhat's the logic there?
well Jacques was faster than Damon, basically. Neither of them would have won a WDC in equal cars against Schumacher and Hakkinen and the like but Damon has to be one of the least talented drivers to ever win the WDC. At least Jacques had some serious raw speed.
Well, i'd agree that Villeneuve was outright faster, but to be fair to Damon his speed was quite underrated, and then there's his well-documented racecraft; also i could name several drives by him that were just stunning, drives of a champion if you will.I'd also definitely say that Hill would have made less of a meal of winning the '97 title than Villeneuve did....
See our F1 related articles too!