FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

[al4x]

i bet ferrari were, they screwed up, couldve just changed the tyres if they thought it needed safety car

rain, > inters > more rain > wets> more rain > THEN safety car

[Mikep99]

It's 10 years ago when they managed to get Oliver Gavin out in the safety car when the track was more like a river, but it's not worked this time.

I'd like to know which other teams. I wonder if McL was one? - oh no, perhaps not!!
The fact that most teams were on inters was the evidence that a safety car was not necessary, add to this that, at one point, Rubins was the fastest man there (much quicker than Ferrari) when he was on full wets.
Ferrari only wanted a safety car because Felipe was spending his time piroetting like a ballet dancer and Kimi was falling backwards. Typical Ferrari tactic when they are losing.

True. Ferrari and a few no hopers trying to steal a few cheap points. Thankfully Whiting laughed at the lot of them and the result wasn't allowed to be marred like the 1998 race.

No I don't think safety car was required either.

Mate can you categorically say with 100% certanty that if Hammy was running 4 or 5th McLaren would not have also maybe just maybe asked the same question as well.
Please don't tell me NO because McLaren don't do things like that because they are so hounorable, and just
That Myth is busted mate.

Like I said before why didn't the FIA bias come into play
I suppose that Myth may also be busted to some degree

Keep it up mate



Your arguments seem to be very inconsistent or maybe its just lamb logic

[Jensonb]

Ferrari only wanted a safety car because Felipe was spending his time piroetting like a ballet dancer and Kimi was falling backwards. Typical Ferrari tactic when they are losing.

Get over it, Martin