- 24 Feb 10, 12:14#186979
No, I don't think it's a flaw. The likes of Nigel Roebuck and Tony Dron seem to think it is, that was my point really. I agree entirely on Hamilton, when I posted, I was compiling a mental list of F1 drivers who in my opinion are/were no better or worse than Michael for aggressive and unsporting driving. On this list was Lewis Hamilton, Juan Pablo Montoya, Jack Brabham, Giuseppe Farina, Ayrton Senna, Rene Arnoux, Parnelli Jones...
I saw every Schumacher incident (yeah, even Aus '94) as it happened, the press made no difference to me!
Well yeh me too. and there was a discussion with valid points made by each side following all of Schumacher's infamous incidents. These nuances are omitted from any reference in the press to these incidents these days as they do not fit the desired narrative of 'Schumacher is a villain' or for the more measured publications 'Schumacher has a flaw in his psychology'.
I don't believe at all that he behaved any better or worse than a number of other determined and aggressive drivers, past and present.
I don't think it is a flaw, it is the over developed "win at all cost" instinct. I am sure that anyone that is that focused on winning would do it. mark my words give Lewis 5 years and he will have some similar type of history as well
No, I don't think it's a flaw. The likes of Nigel Roebuck and Tony Dron seem to think it is, that was my point really. I agree entirely on Hamilton, when I posted, I was compiling a mental list of F1 drivers who in my opinion are/were no better or worse than Michael for aggressive and unsporting driving. On this list was Lewis Hamilton, Juan Pablo Montoya, Jack Brabham, Giuseppe Farina, Ayrton Senna, Rene Arnoux, Parnelli Jones...
