FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

[LRW]

Hey Guys .....sorry for problem I did think I was being ridiculed, but I didn't know why...

Sorry Ang, thats my bad. I will try to be less ambiguous.

[ang4f1]

Hey Guys .....sorry for problem I did think I was being ridiculed, but I didn't know why...

Sorry Ang, thats my bad. I will try to be less ambiguous.

Hey thats okay...love reading the posts...
I better not say ..'Keep it up' ....or you might think I was talkin dirty

[CookinFlat6]

You're nuts, dude.

He was ranting against a direct Hamilton quote I posted. How more informed could I possibly get?

aww, god, you're cute, cookie.

Again I give you benefit of doubt and try to explain what is clear to many who have seen a certain pattern come and go over the years

To respond to a post with a single line diverting focus to the poster and not the post itself is a centuries old cop out for those who have run out of intellectual steam - its reffred to as argumentum ad hominem - where the guy who is bankrupt of any further meaningful contribution attacks the credibility of his opponent and abandons the topic in hand - you do this a lot

To call someone 'nuts' without reason, without any psychological training or expertise and in a casual manner is like a waving flag. To exhibit a pattern of calling people you hardly know 'nuts' - like your laughable claim that lewis has mental issues, which you then claim to have not meant yet are ready to aim it at someone else suggests to any layman that you have some interest in mental issues yourself. Now you are obviously not on the side of a practitioner or academic (you wouldnt have pasted those random articles) and unlike Zurich you are unable to present any case for it

so where does that leave us

With a lot more entertainment to come

[What's Burning?]

We still talking about this? I say we see Nico come from the back of the grid up to the podium before any more crap is spread on the field.

[What's Burning?]

Fun fact of the day. This season when he hasn't DNF'd Nico has managed to go backwards from pole position just as often as he's won from pole position.

Anyone guess what' Lewis' record is when he starts on pole and finishes the race?

I hear a lot of noize from da haterz, and as long as Geet keep up his "support" we know we're good. I mean new and creative ways to lose a race.

Since Roth is such a fan, I can imagine how much he was cheering for Lewis last Sunday!

[CookinFlat6]

Roth missed most of the action in the race as he was so excited by Jensons inspired tyre gamble that allowed him to lead the race that he got his head and shoulders bottle out and 'celebrated'

[Hammer278]

Roth missed most of the action in the race as he was so excited by Jensons inspired tyre gamble that allowed him to lead the race that he got his head and shoulders bottle out and 'celebrated'

[youtube]MJKc3gQGdjI[/youtube]

[stonemonkey]

http://www.mercedesamgf1.com/en/news/20 ... oto-wolff/

[CookinFlat6]

good read stoney

Toto is in way above his head, this could be the achilles heel going forward if another team closes up. Its the same thing at the recent McLaren and Ferrari with Domenically. Middle manager mentality dropped in a fluid and dynamic environment. He probably thinks Nico and Lewis are interchangeable and the fact that one is 0.2 seconds faster means they are just as fast as each other.

And Paddy has let Toto become the defacto TP instead of half a TP

Maybe Niki needs an executive role

[What's Burning?]

ESPNF1 When asked if he would have done the same thing in Hamilton's position, Rosberg replied: "I'm sorry that's not something that's relevant now to discuss. It's hypothetical, theoretical, it's not relevant."

Weren't we talking about this yesterday.

[CookinFlat6]

RECOVERIES SHOW MENTAL STRENGTH

Hamilton has had a tough time in recent races, with reliability problems in qualifying in Germany and Hungary leaving him well down the order.

But despite having pulled off some brilliant recoveries to take third place in both events, he admits the mental challenges he has faced have been draining.

However, he takes heart from the fact that he has been able to produce results on the back of such troubles.

"I think it has been a very challenging, and trying and testing last two weeks," he said. "To be able to still keep myself together is, I think, important.

"I saw some stories that I was going to crack under the pressure, but I think hopefully this will show that I am not, and that I am still in the fight."

Whos gonna be the one to have to tell Lewis the truth

Dear Lewis,

Roth says your mental weakness is permanent mate, its still there despite those races, you might as well embrace your desperation and sloppiness as you carve through the field next time

You know Im the only one that tells you straight

your best buddy

Jenson

[What's Burning?]

PS, you were Lucky last weekend?

[racechick]

wine spluttering!

[RyRy]

You can't be serious...

Hamilton had less downforce due to the lap 1 cold brakes, he was also in a brand new car that he hadn't raced in before, he was also nursing brakes too because they were overheating running behind multiple cars.

I wasn't knocking Hamilton. Why have you made it about Hamilton. We're talking about Nico.

Hamilton & Nico, you're always knocking Hamilton and praising up Nico Rosberg.

He didn't "allow" him past, what the hell are you talking about, he got outraced by a Toro Rosso, you can see that because the lap after he was first overtaken he still attempted to make two moves on Vergne but failed.

He had brake issues straight after the SC. I'm not making this up. That's how Vergne got by. I thought this was just generally understood, and the issue was with Nico's inability to regain the place.

I didn't say you was, Hamilton too had brake issues though so this is equal. Vergne did NOT get past because of Rosbergs brakes, Vergne got past because he outraced Nico.

Hamilton was NOT on grippier tyres, they had the same tyres and he just performed better with what he had. He passed Vergne in style, both were on old tyres and he did one of the hardest overtakes on this track, smashing Rosberg. Hamilton, Alonso, Riccardo would have all easily of passed Vergne if they were in Rosbergs car.

That's what I meant by 'grippier'. He made them last better. I complimeted him on that fact.

Rosberg had less dirty air, more grip and failed he pitted lap 33 just so he was ahead of Rosberg after both had pitted. He never mentioned that his tyres were shot and they looked fine when he pitted, a bit of wear but nothing that bad.

DRS does not cancel eachother out, that's a beyond foolish statement, the track isn't long enough for a DRS pass to happen but it gives you plenty of space on the short start finish straight if you're the car ahead.

What? That doesn't make sense. DRS is supposed to give you an advantage. If you both have the same ability to take that advantage, it's not an advantage anymore. And if the "track isn't long enough for a DRS pass to happen" why have a go at Rosberg for it. But then apparently on the main straight, where it's deployed it does give you an advantage? Draw me a diagram because your words are confusing me.

It's hard to explain but basically DRS doesn't give you that big of an advantage to overtake but if you're trying to overtake a car without drs you should be pretty close to making a move every time, so when the caterpillar effect is happening with a car in front of you using DRS it's impossible.

Hamilton vs Rosberg was exactly the same scenario as Rosberg vs Vergne just with Hamilton's car, tyres being much hotter and both Hamilton and Vergne having older tyres. Rosberg SHOULD have overtaken Vergne but failed. Hamilton showed who's the better driver straight away.

Your arguments are really quite worthless, I don't know if I can take you serious or not, either way I know I'm correct and plenty of others agree with me.

As long as you know you're correct, that's the important thing.

I and plenty of others know I'm correct, your blind hatred for Hamilton is beyond pathetic.

[RyRy]

See, Roth, none of the hamilton fans can even acknowledge that a safety car happened, let alone gifted hamilton a podium spot.

Geet your getting confused with Hokenheim!!

Ahahaha, good point RC.

However, let me respond to geet. Yes the safety car did help Hamilton a little bit BUT he was also flying through the field and by lap 8 he was in 13th... if you remove the laps it took him to catch the field back up after cold brakes meant he went off on lap 1 then from lap 4 to 8 he went from from 21st to 13th, he dispatched several cars per lap and was pretty much matching the leaders pace WITH having to make overtaking moves.

Now lets go to the end of the race when the team screwed up stratagy for Hamilton, Rosberg was given softs, softs which was the obvious right way to go but for some stupid reason they put Hamilton on the mediums to the end of the race, if they had put BOTH drivers on soft, soft strategy they would have had a 1, 2 for sure