FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

[CookinFlat6]

just pointing out that Roth was complaining about being bullied recently and you were discussing the pack mentality as poor roth had a few diiferent members ridiculing his baseless statement that Lewis has a permanent mental weakness

Yet I notice ang receiving some ridicule for her factual and pertinent statement.

And apart from geet, the members involved in this pack mentality think its ok to draw an arbitrary line in the sand to when gentle ribbing becomes unbearable and start moaning.

It would be like DD playing a bondage game with you that you are all enthusiastic about until you suddenly decide to call the feds because ypu have been assaulted

[CookinFlat6]

Can't see that Ang was ridiculed there Cookie.

See, Roth, none of the hamilton fans can even acknowledge that a safety car happened, let alone gifted hamilton a podium spot.

http://www1.skysports.com/f1/news/12433/9399443/nico-rosberg-questions-timing-of-safety-cars-appearance-in-hungarian-gp

I think Lewis was 13th when safety car came out & same position when it went in....

less Ang per se, and more 'Hamilton fans' in general, but the point remains, stones glass houses etc

[LRW]

Yet I notice ang receiving some ridicule for her factual and pertinent statement.....

Thats what I thought. And yet I fail to see it.

If you are referring to me (because yet again you fail to have the balls to name names), I was actually highlighting Geets lack of factual correctness.

[racechick]

I took that as LRW using Ang's factual statement to show how wrong Geet was with his comment? no?

[LRW]

I took that as LRW using Ang's factual statement to show how wrong Geet was with his comment? no?

Geet said no lewis fans will acknowledge it.

So a leiws fan came on and acknowledged it, and at the same time proved Geet to be very misinformed.

I felt it a 'doh' moment.

[Roth]

just pointing out that Roth was complaining about being bullied recently and you were discussing the pack mentality as poor roth had a few diiferent members ridiculing his baseless statement that Lewis has a permanent mental weakness

I wasn't complaining about being bullied, I was calling you out on it. That's all I did. It was intended to highlight your behaviour so you might tone it down a little.

Your attempted bullying of me clearly isn't working. I'm stunned you haven't got that yet.

[Hammer278]

That's a problem when sarcasm is used in text, its easy to misunderstand. Cooks took it the wrong way this time.

[CookinFlat6]

Apologies LRW I misread that,

with your particular brand of wit and dry humour, (which I normally appreciate) its sometimes hard to be sure, I thought the smiley was directed at Ang, geet deserves 18 smileys at once

[LRW]

Apologies LRW I misread that,

with your particular brand of wit and dry humour, (which I normally appreciate) its sometimes hard to be sure, I thought the smiley was directed at Ang, geet deserves 18 smileys at once

Thats no problem Cookin' - easy mistake.

[CookinFlat6]

just pointing out that Roth was complaining about being bullied recently and you were discussing the pack mentality as poor roth had a few diiferent members ridiculing his baseless statement that Lewis has a permanent mental weakness

I wasn't complaining about being bullied, I was calling you out on it. That's all I did. It was intended to highlight your behaviour so you might tone it down a little.

Your attempted bullying of me clearly isn't working. I'm stunned you haven't got that yet.

mate, no one is gonna take you seriously enough to attempt anything when you come out with gems like this as a response to a pointing out of your 'uninformed' opinions

You're nuts, dude.

[Roth]

just pointing out that Roth was complaining about being bullied recently and you were discussing the pack mentality as poor roth had a few diiferent members ridiculing his baseless statement that Lewis has a permanent mental weakness

I wasn't complaining about being bullied, I was calling you out on it. That's all I did. It was intended to highlight your behaviour so you might tone it down a little.

Your attempted bullying of me clearly isn't working. I'm stunned you haven't got that yet.

mate, no one is gonna take you seriously enough to attempt anything when you come out with gems like this as a response to a pointing out of your 'uninformed' opinions

You're nuts, dude.

He was ranting against a direct Hamilton quote I posted. How more informed could I possibly get?

aww, god, you're cute, cookie.

[ang4f1]

Hey Guys .....sorry for problem I did think I was being ridiculed, but I didn't know why...

So I've just watched BBC Highlights......
It was mentioned on lap 41....that Lewis could win this race...
" Hamilton is looking very, very good for a potential victory today."
Then later a discussion about drivers success from pit lane ....and that there had been a victory from back of grid, but not the pit lane etc...
So why didn't Merc see that?...he did have track position after all.

[racechick]

I think Merc couldn't get out of the mindset that win would come from Rosberg. They didn't think on their feet and didn't adapt to the situation. You would think someone on the pitwall could manage that, Lewis had his mind in it whilest actually driving the car!

[Hammer278]

He was ranting against a direct Hamilton quote I posted. How more informed could I possibly get?

aww, god, you're cute, cookie.

Oh... so when someone points out that you misunderstood the context in a super short interview, that's classified as a 'rant'. Ok.

[Roth]

He was ranting against a direct Hamilton quote I posted. How more informed could I possibly get?

aww, god, you're cute, cookie.

Oh... so when someone points out that you misunderstood the context in a super short interview, that's classified as a 'rant'. Ok.

Yeah that was a rant. I've seen enough recently to know one when I see one.