- 01 Mar 11, 17:44#241858
It was more of a principle of the matter point, think it was f1er who said one incident was punishable the other wasn't etc, so the one that was punishable must be worse, I said that's not necessarily the case, of course my reasons could've been what your saying that we don't actually know what happened, but I didn't want to make that point.
Take the current context out of what I said, its a generic statement.
Whats the issue then? There is no PROOF they are only allegations ie assumptions and you know what they make right?
It was more of a principle of the matter point, think it was f1er who said one incident was punishable the other wasn't etc, so the one that was punishable must be worse, I said that's not necessarily the case, of course my reasons could've been what your saying that we don't actually know what happened, but I didn't want to make that point.
Take the current context out of what I said, its a generic statement.