I'm not saying that Hamilton is poor or good. Or am I saying he is both? Is that neutrality? DD help? 
I also had a second motive in a running a social experiment like What's Burning stated. But that social experiment is to see if we can have a level-headed discussion with level-headed opinions like myownalias did.
But I'm imploring for you guys to convince me one way or the other. 
It was like we saw Hamilton's split-personality in Monaco. I think I'm the only one on record here to say that he forced Massa into that mistake in the tunnel, by getting alongside him and then overtaking him. That is the best overtake I have seen in my life. But we also saw where it went horribly wrong. We can see that he is absolutely determined to win another title.
However, I used to rate him as the best driver there. That was last year in fact. But this year I've noticed that Button is also finishing strongly as well. While he isn't ballsy, he appears to have a level head. If Mclaren had the best car on the grid, and they were constantly locking out the front row, who would win? Button or Hamilton? I'm not sure anymore. I'm starting to appreciate Button's approach to racing, more than Hamilton's. Yet quite clearly hoping for the front two cars' wheels to fall off in Monaco is not a good approach. However, it is level-headed in that he would prefer to finish 2nd or 3rd than not at all.
Meanwhile, Alonso is quite clearly driving very well, to be in contention almost every race, and yet have a car that only appears to be good enough to languish around in the midfield.
Do you notice I'm always stating something good, and then have a "but" or a "however" to counteract that good with something the opposite? I can't form an opinion. I need your help!
Why does it need to be the best car on the grid for Button to beat Lewis,shouldn't he be doing that week in and week out if he is such a good driver? Button beat Lewis in Monaco through chance, not by out and out racing. Up until Q3 Lewis as usual was ahead of his team mate and IMO would of put the car on pole or come a very close second to Vettel. You can like Jenson driving style all you want but that does not win races,it's bottless and boring.
Simple Question is who out of the three you mention is second to Vettel,it's not Button and it's not Alonso,it's Lewis even after the bad weekend. As for Lewis becoming a crash bandit,well it was Vettel last year and Mark Webber so i guess each year someone has their turn. One race and Lewis has crashed twice and all of a sudden he is a crash bandit,lol wistful thinking on your part i would say.
Mark Brundle said it plain and clear..
"The earlier contact with Felipe Massa is less clear. Massa did turn into the hairpin very early but could well argue that he was aiming inside the wide Red Bull of Mark Webber who was on his nose. It's also arguable that Massa was too late in defending. Hamilton's move, although again he had been very close behind in the corner before, did unquestionably cause contact and damage, and Paul Di Resta had already received a penalty for a similar misdemeanour. I said in commentary before the incident that there must be a 75% chance of contact while passing into that hairpin, and I stand by that"
"Having seen further footage not available to me in commentary, I do think that Lewis was treated harshly in the incident involving Pastor Maldonado, although that penalty didn't affect his sixth place. He was all over the back of Maldonado's weaving Williams down the pit straight and he should not have been surprised to have Hamilton moving alongside him into the corner. He should have left more space or covered the inside better. I would not have penalised Lewis in this incident"
"Lewis Hamilton is the most aggressive and hardest charging driver on the grid today, just as his hero Ayrton Senna used to be. Unsurprisingly Lewis's style gets him in more trouble than most. Thinking back to Spa 2008, among other incidents, it is certainly possible to build a case that he is punished more than others"
"Champion drivers will always create and seize upon gaps and half chances that others don't, it's one of the factors which makes them special. But there has to be a gap to drive into"
MS sucks footballs..