- 19 Mar 11, 22:32#245153
Then by that notion gasses exiting via starter hole (RBR,Ferrari) it's illegal as well?
Wouldn't that count as a third exit?
All speculation agree
but we dont have to stop talking about it
Well where does an exhaust end? where the gas reaches the air? If the gas touches bodywork then technically it hasnt reached its end and said bodywork is apart of the exhaust system right? then blown diffusers are illegal.
The difference is, they've only got 2 exits... do you see what i mean?
What if the octopus is detached from the pipe exit by even half a mm? what then?
Maca will always get the stick from a corrupt FIA,it's nothing new.While other teams' loopholes are turned a blind eye FIA makes their special rulebook for Maca
It's still directing exhaust gases though. And there are [i]STILL more than two clear exits. I guess exhaust 'exit' is defined as the point where the gases leave an enclosed space, ie one that has material fully surrounding it. That's what i'd class it as but it's more important what the stewards might class it as i guess. I'm just trying to explain why such a system might be outlawed...[/i]
Your sob story regarding McLaren's FIA treatment is somewhat unfounded because if it really were true, then they would have simply banned the f-duct last season and forced McLaren to completely rethink a large part of their aero package, rather than letting them have a nice straight line speed advantage for a decent portion of the season!
All this debate, i dunno why we're all getting so worked up over what is still merely internet forum speculation really
Then by that notion gasses exiting via starter hole (RBR,Ferrari) it's illegal as well?

All speculation agree

