- 16 Jan 12, 14:00#288217
Hmm, that doesn't make sense though cause you really think Alonso would allow Vettel there on equal number 1 terms? Nope, hence my actual point (ie Ferrari would have to be looking to get two of the best on the grid, something they haven't done for 30 odd years, over 20 if you count Mansell/Prost). So to claim it is a 'probability' and 'likely to happen' for Vettel to move based on what you are saying is frankly ridiculous. You could even put a stronger argument about Kubica going there, because there are actually rumours going around about that. But i wouldn't claim it's a probability.
So the concept of Vettel and Alonso at Ferrari seems a probability and likely to happen.
Based on how Ferrari operated over 30 years ago?
No, based on how Ferrari operated as far back as... hmmm... 2009, so I guess less than 10 per cent of that!
Hmm, that doesn't make sense though cause you really think Alonso would allow Vettel there on equal number 1 terms? Nope, hence my actual point (ie Ferrari would have to be looking to get two of the best on the grid, something they haven't done for 30 odd years, over 20 if you count Mansell/Prost). So to claim it is a 'probability' and 'likely to happen' for Vettel to move based on what you are saying is frankly ridiculous. You could even put a stronger argument about Kubica going there, because there are actually rumours going around about that. But i wouldn't claim it's a probability.

Rising number one of Formula 1, Juan - Juan, one wonders should Juan only win one Formula 1 one year, would Juan have won that one in round one, Juan??