- 05 Jun 08, 12:34#46746
True, but Senna openly stated this. That's the difference between Hamilton and Senna. With Senna you knew that if the car wasn't up to standard, it would not be long before he was on his way. And with Senna you knew he would drive a hard bargain, and that he would use any means necessary to secure the best deal for himself. Hamilton, however, pretends he's as nice as pie. I'd respect him a lot more if he'd stop pissing about with his "nice boy" act, and I'd respect his fans a hell of a lot more if they'd acknowledge that Hamilton is not all sweetness and light.
Hamilton's situation at McLaren was a hell of a lot different from any other driver. Alonso, for instance, had no previous ties with McLaren. Hamilton, however, was mentored and paid for by McLaren. Ron Dennis in particular a hell of a lot of time and energy in Hamilton from when he was a young boy. Hamilton, therefore, has enormous debts of loyalty to McLaren and Ron Dennis. It's understandable that Hamilton wanted to get in a Formula One car as soon as possible and was unhappy when he was told to wait another season. In that case, however, what you don't do is sneak off behind your mentor's back and try to negotiate a secret deal with another team. You talk things through with your mentor and discuss the issues. That was the very least he owned McLaren. As it worked out, McLaren were right to wait another year on Hamilton anyway. Hamilton, therefore, should shut his face and listen to the people who know best.
Business is business, I'm not naive and can see that, but there has to be an element of trust and mutual respect between partners. Hamilton, so far, has not learned this. If I were a team boss, that would put me off offering him a drive.
Finally, using Senna's behaviour as a weapon against me in a debate is ineffective, for unlike Hamilton's cronies, I acknowledge my favourite drivers faults and not just their strengths. Senna was a brilliant driver, got on well with people at his teams and cared for his fellow drivers. That said, he could be a right bar steward at times.
Ayrton Senna: WDC 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991
McLaren: WCC 1974, 1984, 1985, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1998, 1999, 2007
McLaren: WDC 1974, 1976, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1998, 1999, 2008
I'm sure Senna would have been quite happy to dump the Mclaren team and go somewhere else if it meant he would win more titles.
True, but Senna openly stated this. That's the difference between Hamilton and Senna. With Senna you knew that if the car wasn't up to standard, it would not be long before he was on his way. And with Senna you knew he would drive a hard bargain, and that he would use any means necessary to secure the best deal for himself. Hamilton, however, pretends he's as nice as pie. I'd respect him a lot more if he'd stop pissing about with his "nice boy" act, and I'd respect his fans a hell of a lot more if they'd acknowledge that Hamilton is not all sweetness and light.
The partnership between Lewis and Ron is two way. Lewis wanted to leave for Williams probably because he felt that Ron wasn't holding up his end of the bargain. I fault no man for wanting to be a champion and doing whatever is necessary (within reason) to win.
Hamilton's situation at McLaren was a hell of a lot different from any other driver. Alonso, for instance, had no previous ties with McLaren. Hamilton, however, was mentored and paid for by McLaren. Ron Dennis in particular a hell of a lot of time and energy in Hamilton from when he was a young boy. Hamilton, therefore, has enormous debts of loyalty to McLaren and Ron Dennis. It's understandable that Hamilton wanted to get in a Formula One car as soon as possible and was unhappy when he was told to wait another season. In that case, however, what you don't do is sneak off behind your mentor's back and try to negotiate a secret deal with another team. You talk things through with your mentor and discuss the issues. That was the very least he owned McLaren. As it worked out, McLaren were right to wait another year on Hamilton anyway. Hamilton, therefore, should shut his face and listen to the people who know best.
Business is business, I'm not naive and can see that, but there has to be an element of trust and mutual respect between partners. Hamilton, so far, has not learned this. If I were a team boss, that would put me off offering him a drive.
Finally, using Senna's behaviour as a weapon against me in a debate is ineffective, for unlike Hamilton's cronies, I acknowledge my favourite drivers faults and not just their strengths. Senna was a brilliant driver, got on well with people at his teams and cared for his fellow drivers. That said, he could be a right bar steward at times.

Ayrton Senna: WDC 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991
McLaren: WCC 1974, 1984, 1985, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1998, 1999, 2007
McLaren: WDC 1974, 1976, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1998, 1999, 2008