- 21 Feb 15, 00:48#433341
Just a thought: technically, this is the Anything Else section, so F1 related questions wouldn't be what I expect here
Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connaît point.
Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans
The correct answer has been split into 10 units, therefore a correct response would be one that succesfully attempts 10 units and a would have a response that sets out to fail by not addressing all 10 of the required units
Just a thought: technically, this is the Anything Else section, so F1 related questions wouldn't be what I expect here
The correct answer has been split into 10 units, therefore a correct response would be one that succesfully attempts 10 units and a would have a response that sets out to fail by not addressing all 10 of the required units
Huh? It says 'bonus' question. So optional obviously!
So am I right or not?!
Thanks.
Just a thought: technically, this is the Anything Else section, so F1 related questions wouldn't be what I expect here
The correct answer has been split into 10 units, therefore a correct response would be one that succesfully attempts 10 units and a would have a response that sets out to fail by not addressing all 10 of the required units
Huh? It says 'bonus' question. So optional obviously!
So am I right or not?!
Thanks.
Why would anyone not want the bonus
Anyway you are close enough - 8 out of 63 times, a driver has won the WDC without having the benefit of a team good enough to win the WCC. The biggest statistical evidence that F1 success is not ALWAYS about having the bestcar
The correct answer has been split into 10 units, therefore a correct response would be one that succesfully attempts 10 units and a would have a response that sets out to fail by not addressing all 10 of the required units
Huh? It says 'bonus' question. So optional obviously!
So am I right or not?!
Thanks.
Why would anyone not want the bonus
Anyway you are close enough - 8 out of 63 times, a driver has won the WDC without having the benefit of a team good enough to win the WCC. The biggest statistical evidence that F1 success is not ALWAYS about having the bestcar
Ahhh. But then you have missed Raikkonen on your list. McLaren only lost the wcc that year due to the Alonso/Hamilton Hungary penalty, well and then having all their wcc points stripped.
Bonus questions are fine if you know the answer!
Boosty, that mush between your ears is not there simply to fill up your skull, its used for thinking too.
Please THINK before making these statements. McLaren had intel on Ferrari secrets (due to Ferrari employees' idiocy) and thus had the advantage of improving their machinery to match Ferrari. However, due to Alonso and Hamilton getting penalized here and there, this also helped Kimi with his driver points, did it not? Or are you going to say it did not contribute to Kimi's performance.
The end result is the end result - McLaren had 0 WCC points that year due to various circumstances. The question is about answering based on facts, it doesn't require your bias and other ingredients to jump in to distort a simple answer.
Boosty, that mush between your ears is not there simply to fill up your skull, its used for thinking too.
Please THINK before making these statements. McLaren had intel on Ferrari secrets (due to Ferrari employees' idiocy) and thus had the advantage of improving their machinery to match Ferrari. However, due to Alonso and Hamilton getting penalized here and there, this also helped Kimi with his driver points, did it not? Or are you going to say it did not contribute to Kimi's performance.
The end result is the end result - McLaren had 0 WCC points that year due to various circumstances. The question is about answering based on facts, it doesn't require your bias and other ingredients to jump in to distort a simple answer.
thats 2 questions and is hardly trivia when its not a fact and is open to intepretation. Different people will have different answers. Architectural monument? what does that even mean? do you mean surviving human made feature? Whose definition of temple?
Whats hard to understand about Trivia.Fact - trivial - not a matter of life and death, fact - proven undisputed fact
this could be anywhere from Serbia to Southern Africa to China - all places that have all discovered the oldest pyramids/temples/shrines at some point or the other
Maybe you should have stuck to a fact about Christian Horners wedding or something you know about
Probably in Mesopotamia, i.e., Iraq, Syria, Southern Turkey, thereabouts where agriculture and the concept of settlements started out some 10000 years ago.
See our F1 related articles too!