About FORUMula1.com
F1 and Motorsport Forums
F1 and Motorsport Forums
geetface9 wrote:You were much smarter before becoming a Rosberg fan.racechick wrote:Lucky lucky boy wasn't he. Three times a lucky boy in that raceHamilton was pretty lucky that timo glock gifted him a world championship
1) git away with locking up a the first corner
2) got away with leaving the track
3) got away with the brake failure.
Lucky in Monaco too, got away with the parking thing.
And in the British GP last year after Lewis' tyre exploded they called Rosberg in and his was on the point of explosion.
Very lucky boy.



CookinFlat6 wrote:I suspect geet loves itOh I $#@!*& do
Hammer278 wrote:geetface9 wrote:You were much smarter before becoming a Rosberg fan.racechick wrote:Lucky lucky boy wasn't he. Three times a lucky boy in that raceHamilton was pretty lucky that timo glock gifted him a world championship
1) git away with locking up a the first corner
2) got away with leaving the track
3) got away with the brake failure.
Lucky in Monaco too, got away with the parking thing.
And in the British GP last year after Lewis' tyre exploded they called Rosberg in and his was on the point of explosion.
Very lucky boy.
geetface9 wrote: For real though, luck has played a role in many championships so I'm being cheeky yet truthful at the same timeNot truthful in that instance, sorry. You did watch the race right? Glock slowing down on the last lap was not an element of luck for Hamilton and I trust you realize that.
After the agony of defeat, success will be sweet!Hammer278 wrote:You'll have to elaborate for me. I've seen only highlights of it. I thought glock had an off two or three turns before the straight because he was on dry tires in the wet?geetface9 wrote: For real though, luck has played a role in many championships so I'm being cheeky yet truthful at the same timeNot truthful in that instance, sorry. You did watch the race right? Glock slowing down on the last lap was not an element of luck for Hamilton and I trust you realize that.

CookinFlat6 wrote:A lot of F1 nowadays appears to be a tale of the blind leading the blindHow so? Speak on it, brotha!
geetface9 wrote:Trulli's times where comparible to Glocks so I do not believe that he slowed down for Hamilton.Hammer278 wrote:You'll have to elaborate for me. I've seen only highlights of it. I thought glock had an off two or three turns before the straight because he was on dry tires in the wet?geetface9 wrote: For real though, luck has played a role in many championships so I'm being cheeky yet truthful at the same timeNot truthful in that instance, sorry. You did watch the race right? Glock slowing down on the last lap was not an element of luck for Hamilton and I trust you realize that.
edit: I just rewatched the last lap. Yeah glock slowed down two turns before the end. Was it because of his dry tires? Lucky hamilton

What's Burning? wrote:I love how it's only Hamilton winning because of luck.Yeah that's a good point. I'm not saying at all hamilton has won four races this year because of luck. He outright smoked everybody four races in a row. Idk jack about the 2007 championship, or much more about the 2008 championship. I totally get how pissed people are cuz of the 2008 spa incident. The stewards should have let it be from what I've seen, the same way they let it be for rosberg.
So Kimmi didn't win his 2007 championship because is was handed to him on a silver platter?
Hamilton was lucky in Brazil because of Glock and not a peep about being docked the race winning points in Belgium ironically because he cut the chicane while battling Kimi in the wet and was penalized 25 seconds. Cutting the chicane... got him a 25 second penalty.
Nico is a LUCKY boy.

McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]
Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!