- 30 Jan 12, 21:13#289189
The original data published was faked even though it is in the scientific journals, so if you source a study you have to think about there motive. It all depends on who you choose to believe
Are you a leading climatologist with peer reviewed published data?
I will start my long term studies on the global biomes before my next post
Personally I believe the suns activity is a large player in the global temp change
CO2 released by humans pales in comparison to the CO2 released by Forrest fires, swamps and volcanoes
Do you have some quantitative data you base that opinion on or is that something you heard someone say on television once? You know that it's not only the increased release of CO2 into the atmosphere but the fact that we are reducing the planet's ability to soak it back through deforestation so it's a compound problem.
http://www.astro-sharp.com/tggws.asp
Just a small bit, I choose not to buy into end of the world/doomsday BS
Who's talking about doomsday? Doomsday for whom? Our day to day lives would be affected, but the earth will be here long after we're gone so I'm not sure where the doomsday prediction is coming from. Anyway, what you've linked to is a guy's blog... I am talking about you showing supporting empirical data from a recognized research entity showing that forest fires and volcano eruptions spew more CO2 into the atmosphere than the cumulative industrialization of humanity throughout the world. That's the problem with just repeating something without being able to back it up. Saying it doesn't make it true. So in fact you're wrong, the amount of CO2 that is emitted by industrial nations is conservatively estimated at 10 times the amount of CO2 that's released into the atmosphere by volcanic activity yearly on a global basis. Take a look at the 2011 annual energy review from the , US Energy Information Administration not some guy's blog.
Oh and BTW, the guy's blog you linked to is debunking the debunk.
The original data published was faked even though it is in the scientific journals, so if you source a study you have to think about there motive. It all depends on who you choose to believe
Are you a leading climatologist with peer reviewed published data?
I will start my long term studies on the global biomes before my next post
"Ecclestone? You have to show respect for your elders..."
Luca di Montezemolo on B.E.'s response to "flag-gate"
Luca di Montezemolo on B.E.'s response to "flag-gate"