FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

[What's Burning?]

Jenson ran out and bought a beret. He's ready.

[1Lemon]

he should have at least mentioned or paid a tribute to the loser TP who did so much for him

Brawn?

No, he said loser TP, that's lo-ser, LO-SER TP...that means Whitmarsh. Would Cookin imply Brawn is a loser? You're not new to the forum now are you?

No worries Lemonade, I'm here to walk you through reading a post with some effort.

No Brawn is a looser. I mean he likes fishing, come on guys!

[1Lemon]

Okay let's not turn this into another Hamilton thread. No need to kick Whitmarsh when he's down, he's already laid claim to the worst McLaren season in thirty years, is there anything that can be said that will make the guy feel even worse?

EDIT: correction, thirty three years.

Yes there is something that can make him feel worse.... Your correction

[Hammer278]

No Brawn is a looser. I mean he likes fishing, come on guys!

Isn't that interesting? Fishing is considered a sport in a way....so Brawn is keen on both the fastest (quick thinking) and slowest (in a coma) sport in the world.

[sagi58]

...I thought this was a forum where we could express our thoughts. If my thoughts conflicted with anothers then a short discussion would be ok, not a rant, not a demeaning put down, not trying to 'win' the discussion.

Ironically, you seem to do that very thing each and every time anyone doesn't agree with you.
Dumb question of the day: Does that make you hypocritical?
Actually, don't bother answering that! It's a rhetorical question!

[CookinFlat6]

...I thought this was a forum where we could express our thoughts. If my thoughts conflicted with anothers then a short discussion would be ok, not a rant, not a demeaning put down, not trying to 'win' the discussion.

Ironically, you seem to do that very thing each and every time anyone doesn't agree with you.
Dumb question of the day: Does that make you hypocritical?
Actually, don't bother answering that! It's a rhetorical question!

You just proved that you don't bother to read posts before jumping in to criticise other members. That post you seized upon was actually written by the same person who it was replying to. I.e. I was highlighting the double standards, by effectively having them argue with themself as there was nothing else to say.

Looks like the irony went above your head in your eagerness to get ad hominem as usual, you didn't even notice what it was replying to

Now you are just being silly Anyway I am off to bed, go at it with anything you can find to discredit anyone other than Lewis. And you still didn't answer the question I asked. Kinda par for the course is it, deflect, deflect, deflect. Attack, attack, attack.

Night Night

For me, anyone who says something that certain posters disagree with are ridiculed, picked apart, shat on, then picked apart again to be further ridiculed. I thought this was a forum where we could express our thoughts. If my thoughts conflicted with anothers then a short discussion would be ok, not a rant, not a demeaning put down, not trying to 'win' the discussion.

[sagi58]

...I thought this was a forum where we could express our thoughts. If my thoughts conflicted with anothers then a short discussion would be ok, not a rant, not a demeaning put down, not trying to 'win' the discussion.

Ironically, you seem to do that very thing each and every time anyone doesn't agree with you.
Dumb question of the day: Does that make you hypocritical?
Actually, don't bother answering that! It's a rhetorical question!

You just proved that you don't bother to read posts before jumping in to criticise other members. That post you seized upon was actually written by the same person who it was replying to. I.e. I was highlighting the double standards, by effectively having them argue with themself as there was nothing else to say.

Looks like the irony went above your head in your eagerness to get ad hominem as usual, you didn't even notice what it was replying to

First of all, I did read it. Secondly, you did NOT quote it, which makes your comment plagiarism.
Which is why I responded to it, in the first place. Try to give credit where credit is due!!

If anything, you just proved that you lay traps for people with the sole intention of ridiculing them!

[sagi58]

 wrote:">Rob Wilson on Kimi Raikkonen and other driver's styles

Published on Mar 25, 2013

Driving guru Rob Wilson talks about Kimi Raikkonen's ability to get the most out of his car,
and comments on Jenson Button's smooth style outlining the pros and cons

[youtube]TmEoJCKhsqo[/youtube]

[spankyham]

Congrats to Jenson

11:46 A big week for Jenson Button, who has just got engaged to girlfriend Jessica Michibata according to McLaren. Congratulations!

[sagi58]

Just saw that!! I wonder if there's a wedding in the air??
Maybe a baby??

[Hammer278]

Congrats to Jenson for overachieving in that department.

[CookinFlat6]

Yeah, well done to Jenson for proving the old saying 'every dog has its day' and well done to Jessica for proving that the generosity of womenfolk can stray beyond rationality

[Jabberwocky]

Is it in fashionable to be an F1 driver with a pregnant other half or young baby?

Sent using NCC-1701

[Hammer278]

Is it in fashionable to be an F1 driver with a pregnant other half or young baby?

Sent using NCC-1701

Don't know, but Jenson managed that even before becoming an F1 driver.

[CookinFlat6]

I think Jabber means a pregnant other half that you actually man up and stand by and not dump out on the street as soon as you get an F1 seat

(hopefully the usual whingers will disprove this before jumping in to moan and bitch)