- 26 May 13, 18:23#360103
And to be honest, by not dealing with those morons, which the government doesn't seem to be addressing, and certainly to be honest, I don't think is convincing the Muslim community it is . .. more power goes to the radicalists (SP), and more persuasive will their arguments seem.
The Government needs to aim to avoid creating an "us v them" situation, which to be frank, it isn't doing. (By us v them, I am talking about making the entire Islamic community feel "under threat" or similar because of the actions of a few, and the rest of the UK "feeling under threat from terrorism" which the government seems to be going for the complete opposite to be honest.
I think the solution , is for the "official line" to go back to basics, regardless of religion, murder won't be tolerated, the government has no care for what religion or background murders etc. are from, they will do all in their power to prevent it. All murders, in other words, convince the Muslim populace, the reaction isn't stronger because the guy was Muslim and that was his background, and that racism, hate crimes religious intolerance is also a serious issue for the government and will be tackled on Both Sides I hope that won't be a lie though. . .
My opinion of the situation, is the government is failing to convince the Muslim population, it is also interested in their safety and well being, and failing to convince the rest of the population it is competent in dealing with terrorism. Unfortunately, convincing the population it is competent, problem isn't aligned with actually performing the most evdientially and results based tasks etc. in dealing with terrorism. What people want, and what will be best practice, tends to be very different things.
Of course, its the job of democratic leaders, to come up with coherent arguments, as to why their ideas are any good, but well, that's probably not as good an election strategy as simply going with the ideas the public like the most.
Commercial companies do it all the time, but I don't think that is on topic.
And by not dealing with these clerics through the proper channels( which I believe the government are now addressing) more power goes to morons like in that video. And more mainstream people have support for UKIP
And to be honest, by not dealing with those morons, which the government doesn't seem to be addressing, and certainly to be honest, I don't think is convincing the Muslim community it is . .. more power goes to the radicalists (SP), and more persuasive will their arguments seem.
The Government needs to aim to avoid creating an "us v them" situation, which to be frank, it isn't doing. (By us v them, I am talking about making the entire Islamic community feel "under threat" or similar because of the actions of a few, and the rest of the UK "feeling under threat from terrorism" which the government seems to be going for the complete opposite to be honest.
I think the solution , is for the "official line" to go back to basics, regardless of religion, murder won't be tolerated, the government has no care for what religion or background murders etc. are from, they will do all in their power to prevent it. All murders, in other words, convince the Muslim populace, the reaction isn't stronger because the guy was Muslim and that was his background, and that racism, hate crimes religious intolerance is also a serious issue for the government and will be tackled on Both Sides I hope that won't be a lie though. . .
My opinion of the situation, is the government is failing to convince the Muslim population, it is also interested in their safety and well being, and failing to convince the rest of the population it is competent in dealing with terrorism. Unfortunately, convincing the population it is competent, problem isn't aligned with actually performing the most evdientially and results based tasks etc. in dealing with terrorism. What people want, and what will be best practice, tends to be very different things.
Of course, its the job of democratic leaders, to come up with coherent arguments, as to why their ideas are any good, but well, that's probably not as good an election strategy as simply going with the ideas the public like the most.
Commercial companies do it all the time, but I don't think that is on topic.