I am a little concerned about a chain of events at Mclaren. I do not want to go as far as mentioning a conspiracy but something aint adding up. And I am going to put aside all bias concerning drivers or staff and approach it as a Mclaren follower of years who doesnt know anything about the drivers etc
First of all Mclaren turn up with a pretty nose for 2012, unique amongst the teams bar one. Ok so the team have had a lower front for a while and we can say its an approach that is daring but understandable. Even Lewis voices concern that maybe the other teams have an advantage. The non stepped nose is possible because of the low front philosophy and the loss of potential for managing more airflow under the front is acceptable because the team are set around the low front and derive other benefits. The car is developed well and is fastest by year end and the team vow to focus on the reliability issues
For 2013 the car is suddenly changed at the front, out with the low and in with the high just like everyone else. Also a radical pullrod suspension is introduced. This is something that is just not considered by any team for years, since the Minardi team, a back grid outfit played with it. However there was 1 team that gambled on it last year and suffered for half the season making it yield benefits comparable to the dependable pushrod used by RBR and the others.
Who championed and was responsible for introducing this pullrod arrangement? Paddy Lowe!
Paddy Lowe is now on gardening leave as he is off to Merc and kept away from the car. So when was it decided that the 28 would have this new concept which is only really relevant for one more year?
During testing the team have struggled a bit to understand the car with issues arising from lengthy setup change times associated with ......the front just like Ferrari last year.
And now we hear from Whitmarsh that the team have decided to gamble on performance first and reliability second as they want the fastest car by far. This is in stark contrast to the Ferrari team where Alonso says give me a reliable and slightly slower car this year over the fastest but not reliable car. This is the team that spent half last year the 4th fastest car understanding the pullrod front
This is where it gets interesting - Whitmarsh now says he has spoken with, and is bringing back to work on areas not having a bearing on 2014........non other than Paddy Lowe!
Whitmarsh added that he spoke last week to former technical director Paddy Lowe, who is on gardening leave before joining Mercedes next year, and will do so again on his return from Australia with the view of continuing to use his expertise this season.
He said: "The beauty is that there are quite big areas of this year's regulations which are completely not applicable going forward so I would hope we will get him involved in some of those challenges."
When Lewis signed for Merc he would have been told something concrete to make him believe that there was no mileage staying at Mac vs moving to Merc
And Button was categoric about the fact that the 27 was no good for him, but the 28 would be
So what is going on here?
Did Paddy create something Goss couldnt handle just before he jumped ship? Or did he jump ship because he was asked to create something he didnt believe in? maybe a panic decision in the middle of last year? Did this cause Lewis/Paddy to talk to Merc?
I just cannot see how McLaren are gambling all or nothing on a radical 2 sec advantage car, needing to bring Paddy back, reversing the approach on reliability and deciding now that with 1 year left was the time to join the others as the low front was afterall flawed with regard to development potential? Did they not know this at the start of 2012 if even Lewis was pointing to the other teams?
Finally Whitmarsh seems to single out Mercedes when talking about getting to the bottom of reliability issues
"We've been working hard with [engine supplier] Mercedes-Benz on some of the issues we saw last year, and we've been working internally as well.
Since last year ofcourse the part that gave up in testing was ....a fuel pump
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/21741052
Any ideas?