FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

[Denthúl]

The bodywork stops pretty short at the back, too... I like it.

[What's Burning?]

I think that's a lot to do with the very wide angle lens used to take the picture. There is however a bit of controversy about William's exhaust port, another slit in the middle but apparently Williams are trying to skirt the issue by claiming it's two separate outlets and as long as the aperture is not exceeded then it's okay by the regulations.

[headless]

Very short and stumpy!

[andrew]

Not a pretty sight.

[Nin-Chin]

It looks alright

[scotty]

I think the Williams engineers must have spent all winter playing tetris, they've managed to get a hell of a lot of gear into what doesn't look like a lot of space!

[What's Burning?]

Ant it's not purple.

[acosmichippo]

Without the fin (via WTF1 twitter):

[Denthúl]

Without the fin (via WTF1 twitter):

[andrew]

It looks worse without the fin! They must have got an old Tyrrell engine cover on Ebay.

[LewEngBridewell]

Wow, that's an incredibly interesting car there.

I hope it's a race winner like last year's Williams! Love that team

[Jabberwocky]

It is interesting. Lets hope it is not too radical

[scotty]

Really it's a shame aero takes such priority in F1, cause Williams are still one of, if not the best pure race car engineering teams on the grid.

[racechick]

It looks funny. It looks like the back bit could just snap off. Haven't they said its not legal? I thought they had said that.
There's something about it here
http://goo.gl/fb/EGFIo

[bud]

No the engine cover of theirs is fine, the illegal part in question is the little bridge on the exhaust you can see in the picture attached to the article.