FORUMula1.com - F1 Forum

Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans

By LRW
#346497
Lost me again Andrew, sorry :shrug:


I think he was showing you 'real racers' as requested.
By andrew
#346499
LRW get's it in one! :thumbup:

Just a bit of healthy interteam/driver fan friendly rivalry. :hehe:
User avatar
By racechick
#346500
Oh I see! But Webber and Vettel wouldn't be the first to spring to mind if someone asked me to name real racers. Not saying they're bad at all, they're good, but not quite in my real racer category....Vettel nearly is.
User avatar
By stonemonkey
#346503
Oh yes Mika Hakkinen! Pah statistics! Just show me a real racer! ( and before you start I'd put Schumacher in that category without a doubt)


I've lost track as usual so I hope I'm just reading that out of context.
User avatar
By racechick
#346510
They're in mine. But we differ there and that's ok. :thumbup:

:thumbup:
By LRW
#346516
They're in mine. But we differ there and that's ok. :thumbup:

:thumbup:


Are we turning into a frackin' Hippy Commune....? :hippy: Get back to arguing!! :curse:

:hehe:
By andrew
#346517
Better being civil than putting up with pointless bikering over nothing of real importance. :wink:
User avatar
By darwin dali
#346521
Better being civil than putting up with pointless bikering over nothing of real importance. :wink:

...and get warned and/or banned in the process :yes:
By andrew
#346524
Better being civil than putting up with pointless bikering over nothing of real importance. :wink:

...and get warned and/or banned in the process :yes:


It ain't worth it.
By What's Burning?
#346545
Better being civil than putting up with pointless bikering over nothing of real importance. :wink:

...and get warned and/or banned in the process :yes:


It ain't worth it.

[youtube]uVmU3iANbgk[/youtube]
By What's Burning?
#346558
He is indeed. The only oponent who ever gave Schumacher cause for concern. Dude's a legend. :thumbup:

Well him and Nico Rosberg.

I very much doubt that.

Well of course you would... why would anyone look at facts when your opinion suits your narrative so much better.
By andrew
#346582
What facts? Rosberg and Schumacher were not competitors in the same semce as Schumacher and Hakkinen were. Besides, old man Schumacher has said himself that Hakkinen was the only opponent who worried him 'cos the guy was so damn fast on his day.
By What's Burning?
#346588
What facts? Rosberg and Schumacher were not competitors in the same semce as Schumacher and Hakkinen were. Besides, old man Schumacher has said himself that Hakkinen was the only opponent who worried him 'cos the guy was so damn fast on his day.

So you're saying that Schumacher 2.0 was more mellowed driver and wasn't worried in the slightest of being beaten by his teammate as he was for three consecutive seasons. I get it.

EDIT: I forgot the eye rolley. :rolleyes:
By CookinFlat6
#346646
What facts? Rosberg and Schumacher were not competitors in the same semce as Schumacher and Hakkinen were. Besides, old man Schumacher has said himself that Hakkinen was the only opponent who worried him 'cos the guy was so damn fast on his day.

So you're saying that Schumacher 2.0 was more mellowed driver and wasn't worried in the slightest of being beaten by his teammate as he was for three consecutive seasons. I get it.

EDIT: I forgot the eye rolley. :rolleyes:


In chess a pin occurs when a piece is attacked and if it moves a piece of greater value will be under attack.

:yes:
  • 1
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 254

See our F1 related articles too!