- 13 May 12, 15:22#302956
Exactly which is my point, why not put the guy back to where the car was not legal and slot him in tenth place. It was a supremely harsh penalty and it better be interpreted just like that from here on in for EVERYONE else.
I wasn't one saying it was a once in a lifetime drive. My point is that your comparison of Vettel's performance is apples to oranges, it's ridiculous to compare the two and it's very interesting that you picked your starting point at lap four of your comparison since at that point Lewis had already gained 9 spots, while Vettel has LOST 4 spots. You can massage numbers but if you want raw numbers, then by that account, Lewis picked up 16 spots to Vettel's ten, case closed
time behind the leader is utterly irrelevant in this comparison.
No it's only in parc ferme, Lewis's car didn't breach any rules in Q1 or Q 2.
Exactly which is my point, why not put the guy back to where the car was not legal and slot him in tenth place. It was a supremely harsh penalty and it better be interpreted just like that from here on in for EVERYONE else.
He lost 3.5 seconds in the pit stop today. That would have put him on p7, in front of Rosberg.
As I said, he did well today, but it wasn't a once-in-a-life-time drive. It's what you can expect the three best drivers on the grid.
So yes, Hamilton proved again proved today to be one of the three best drivers on the grid. No, he didn't prove that he is the best.
I wasn't one saying it was a once in a lifetime drive. My point is that your comparison of Vettel's performance is apples to oranges, it's ridiculous to compare the two and it's very interesting that you picked your starting point at lap four of your comparison since at that point Lewis had already gained 9 spots, while Vettel has LOST 4 spots. You can massage numbers but if you want raw numbers, then by that account, Lewis picked up 16 spots to Vettel's ten, case closed

"I don't want to be part of a forum where everyone has differing opinions." Boom...