FORUMula1.com

F1 and Motorsport Forums

#289713
What's Burning? wrote:
andrew wrote:
What's Burning? wrote:
andrew wrote:Who he was called by is irrelevent. He'd either help prove the prosecution wrong and the defence right or vice versa.

No one is discussing Hamilton as if he is the guilty party. As far as I was aware we were discussing the odd so-called friendship between Sutil and Hamilton and the breakdown of said friendship.
You sound as if you're very intimate with the entire situation.
Do I? Don't think I do. I just take the time to read more than just the headlines.
No, it's an opinion of what you think may have been said or not said had Lewis testified, it's all conjecture on your part and no amount of reading other than the headlines will tell you about something that didn't happen. This is something that's being reported because it's ALL ABOUT the headlines because there is nothing of substance to have people interested in it otherwise.
The entire thread is conjecture! There is plenty of information out there to allow one to form an opinion.

I think you're missing Billindenver. :rolleyes:
#289714
andrew wrote:
What's Burning? wrote:
andrew wrote:
What's Burning? wrote:
andrew wrote:Who he was called by is irrelevent. He'd either help prove the prosecution wrong and the defence right or vice versa.

No one is discussing Hamilton as if he is the guilty party. As far as I was aware we were discussing the odd so-called friendship between Sutil and Hamilton and the breakdown of said friendship.
You sound as if you're very intimate with the entire situation.
Do I? Don't think I do. I just take the time to read more than just the headlines.
No, it's an opinion of what you think may have been said or not said had Lewis testified, it's all conjecture on your part and no amount of reading other than the headlines will tell you about something that didn't happen. This is something that's being reported because it's ALL ABOUT the headlines because there is nothing of substance to have people interested in it otherwise.
The entire thread is conjecture! There is plenty of information out there to allow one to form an opinion.

I think you're missing Billindenver. :rolleyes:
I think you're missing Fraffy.
#289715
What's Burning? wrote:
andrew wrote:
What's Burning? wrote:
andrew wrote:
What's Burning? wrote:
andrew wrote:Who he was called by is irrelevent. He'd either help prove the prosecution wrong and the defence right or vice versa.

No one is discussing Hamilton as if he is the guilty party. As far as I was aware we were discussing the odd so-called friendship between Sutil and Hamilton and the breakdown of said friendship.
You sound as if you're very intimate with the entire situation.
Do I? Don't think I do. I just take the time to read more than just the headlines.
No, it's an opinion of what you think may have been said or not said had Lewis testified, it's all conjecture on your part and no amount of reading other than the headlines will tell you about something that didn't happen. This is something that's being reported because it's ALL ABOUT the headlines because there is nothing of substance to have people interested in it otherwise.
The entire thread is conjecture! There is plenty of information out there to allow one to form an opinion.

I think you're missing Billindenver. :rolleyes:
I think you're missing Fraffy.
Not in the least.
#289716
What's Burning? wrote:
andrew wrote:
What's Burning? wrote:
andrew wrote:
What's Burning? wrote:
andrew wrote:Who he was called by is irrelevent. He'd either help prove the prosecution wrong and the defence right or vice versa.

No one is discussing Hamilton as if he is the guilty party. As far as I was aware we were discussing the odd so-called friendship between Sutil and Hamilton and the breakdown of said friendship.
You sound as if you're very intimate with the entire situation.
Do I? Don't think I do. I just take the time to read more than just the headlines.
No, it's an opinion of what you think may have been said or not said had Lewis testified, it's all conjecture on your part and no amount of reading other than the headlines will tell you about something that didn't happen. This is something that's being reported because it's ALL ABOUT the headlines because there is nothing of substance to have people interested in it otherwise.
The entire thread is conjecture! There is plenty of information out there to allow one to form an opinion.

I think you're missing Billindenver. :rolleyes:
I think you're missing Fraffy.
I'm missing certom...
#289718
What's Burning? wrote:^^ and you're missing some melanin as well, you should get out of the dungeon every now and then. Fifteen minutes of sunlight a day.
:nono:
It would be bad for my health!
Image
#289719
darwin dali wrote:I'm missing certom...
I remember that guy, whatever happened to him?!
#289720
scotty wrote:
darwin dali wrote:I'm missing certom...
I remember that guy, whatever happened to him?!
I think it had to do with school, but who knows? And speaking of which: where's suitcase?
#289723
andrew wrote:*polite cough*:D
Scary thread! where do these people go!! Andrew,I first thought you'd done the polite cough because you had inside information about suitcase!
#289725
racechick wrote:
andrew wrote:*polite cough*:D
Scary thread! where do these people go!! Andrew,I first thought you'd done the polite cough because you had inside information about suitcase!
Send a PM and it should send an e-mail alert prompting them to view the PM (assuming their e-mail account attached to their forum account is still in use) and shed some light on their where-abouts.
#289740
There is a LOST MEMBERS thread for this guys! Goodness me, this forum would be in tatters were it not for me, whipping things into shape! :P:whip:
#289743
LewEngBridewell wrote:There is a LOST MEMBERS thread for this guys! Goodness me, this forum would be in tatters were it not for me, whipping things into shape! :P:whip:
Beat you to it mate and I was polite about it! :wink:
#289745
LewEngBridewell wrote:There is a LOST MEMBERS thread for this guys! Goodness me, this forum would be in tatters were it not for me, whipping things into shape! :P:whip:
This reminds me of Newt Gingrich's grandiosity in the current Republican primaries
Image
[whispers: not a good move]
  • 1
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 16
Austin's F1 circuit.

COTA is one of the best tracks on the calendar, an[…]

Really happy to see Max Verstappen win his first r[…]

McLaren Racing opened its new state-of-the-art Rac[…]

Madring was a pretty dull race. I wouldn't mi[…]

Swap-in out addons, use only what you really need!